Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
hearing by your Board on the ground that one of the Members <br />of the Board was disqualified to sit as a member because <br />of personal interest and previous business relationship <br />with one of the parties interested in the action of your <br />Board. <br />Very truly yours, <br />ROBERT L. RYDER, <br />RLR:Y Attorney for Petitioner <br />The secretary was instructed to send the following <br />reply to Mr. Ryder: <br />n <br />Mr. Robert L. Ryder <br />80 Federal Street <br />Boston, Massachusetts <br />Dear Mr. Ryder: <br />September 10, 1938 <br />Your letter of hugust 26th was received <br />when Mr. Maddison was on his vacation. <br />ti <br />The Board had a meeting last night, at which <br />your letter was read. In the first place, we do not know <br />of any provision in the Statutes or the Zoning Laws for a <br />re -hearing after the Board of Appeals has rendered its <br />decision. There is a provision regarding an appeal to the <br />courts. <br />The Board feels that you should have taken <br />the matter up with the Board or privately with the Chairman <br />Pro -tem at the time the notice was read at the hearing, in <br />which case the members could have either decided the question <br />during a recess, or postponed the hearing. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />ELEANOR M. LOWE <br />M:L Secretary, Board of <br />The meeting adjourned at 10:10 P. M. <br />A true record, Attest: <br />Appeals. <br />225 <br />