Laserfiche WebLink
188 <br />905 Mass. Ave., Lexington, Mass. Parties desiring home <br />for retarded children are desirable, no local neighbors <br />objecting. <br />Dr. Harry B. Lee <br />The Board considered the application of Howard M. <br />Munroe for the maintenance of a golf school and range on <br />property owned by him on Lowell Street, Lexington, and in- <br />asmuch as the tees and commercial end of such an occupancy <br />would be in the business district, it felt that the permit <br />should be granted subject to certain conditions. Upon <br />motion of Mr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Glynn, it was unan- <br />imously voted to grant the petition in the following form: <br />BOARD OF APPEALS PERMIT <br />The Board of Appeals, acting under General Laws, Chapter <br />40, Sec. 27, having received a written petition addressed to <br />it by Howard M. Munroe, a copy of which is hereto annexed, <br />held a public hearing thereon of which notice was mailed to <br />the petitioner and to the owners of all property deemed by <br />the Board to be affected thereby as they appear on the most <br />recent local tax list and alto advertised in the Lexington <br />Minute -Man, a newspaper published in Lexington, which hear- <br />ing was held in the Selectmen's Room, in the Town Office <br />Building on the 27th day of May, 1938. <br />Four members of the Board of Appeals were present at <br />the hearing. A certificate of notice is hereto annexed. <br />At this hearing evidence was offered on behalf of the pet- <br />itioner tending to show: That he desired to rent a part of <br />his property on Lowell Street adjacent to the Countryside <br />Restraurant, for a golf school and driving range; the tees <br />to be placed back from Lowell Street about 90 feet. <br />No one appeared in opposition. <br />At the close of the hearing the Board in private session <br />on June 24, 1938, gave considerationto the subject Of the <br />petition and voted unanimously in favor of the following <br />findings: <br />1. That in its judgment the public convenience and <br />welfare will be substantially served by the making of the <br />exception requested. <br />2. That the exception requested will not tend to impair <br />the status of the neighborhood. <br />3. That the exception requested will be in harmony <br />with the general purposes and intent of the regulations in <br />the Lexington Zoning By-lawv. <br />4. That owing to conditions especially affecting the. <br />said parcel but not affecting generally the Zoning district <br />1 <br />