Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />Mr. Connors, Sheldon Robinson, Charles Cambridge and Robert <br />L. Ryder were present at the hearing. <br />Mr. Conners said that about twenty years ago a house was <br />erected which had been used as a tea room. An artificial pool <br />was made to go with this house and was used as a trout pond <br />by the State for growing fish and Mr. Frost of Lexington was in <br />charge of it. It has been closed for some time and Mr. Conners <br />discovered that the water was adapted for the growth and storage <br />of fish, and being interested in fly -casting, he hired the pro- <br />perty and engaged Charles Cambridge to supervise and run the <br />trout pool. The idea was to stock the pond with fish and open <br />the house to any that came there.. He wanted to charge a nominal <br />fee for the trout taken by fly casting and have a little outdoor <br />life and still get enough out of it to give one young man in <br />the town employment. Mr. Conners said that he had a son about <br />the Cambridge boy's age who was working, but Cambridge was not, <br />and the latter's lack of employment really brought about this <br />petition. The locus is probably 1000 feet from Mass. Avenue and <br />the only houses in sight are the ones on Percy Road. He said <br />they were going ahead and open up and had even published a <br />notice of the pool in the papers but had to hold up on account <br />of this hearing. Mr. Corners said that he hoped the Board <br />would grant permission to see if this sort of thing could be <br />carried on. There would be no noise at all. He said that the <br />men interested in fly casting were not the riff-raff. Mr. <br />Conners said he realized that this was a business and he had <br />been lax in not noticing that this was an infraction of the <br />Zoning Laws. Nothing would be offered for sale. A man would <br />have to catch a trout and then it would be weighed and he would <br />be charged for it, that was all. The Chairman asked if that <br />really was not a business, and Mr. Conners replied in the affirm- <br />ative. Mr. Glynn asked how Conners intended to run the pool, <br />as a club or as a commerical business. Conners said he would <br />run it on a commercial basis as it would take too long to <br />organize a club. He said a club would have to have a yearly <br />membership fee and would have to be chartered by the State. Mr. <br />Glynn asked if it would be impossible to do that. Mr. Conners <br />said that it would not, but probably would be difficult to get <br />enough interested parties in the neighborhood to charter the club. <br />He said he was engaged in another line of business and was unable <br />to give any attention to this. <br />The Chairman asked if fishing was allowed on Sundays. Mr. <br />Conners said that the State Law prohibited it, but the law was <br />never enforced and people did fish on Sundays. <br />The Chairman said that he did not quite see how the Board <br />of Appeals could grant the petition, but that a permit could be <br />granted to a club in a residential district. He said the Board <br />of Appeals would have to satisfy itself that this would be a <br />club. Mr. Conners said that he could not make any statement to <br />the effect that it was a club. He said there would be quite a <br />little expense connected with this as it would be necessary to <br />,zuard the trout pool at night. He said that recently 80 half - <br />Pound trout were taken out in one night. Mr. Conners said that <br />123 <br />