Laserfiche WebLink
a <br />Mr. Arthur F'. Mason of Watertown Street said that he rep- <br />resented George W. Norton, the owner of the Peacock Farm, who <br />has been a resident of Lexington fDr some forty years. Mr. <br />Mason said that Mr. Childs called on Mr. Norton when he first <br />started the filling station proposition and Ptr. Norton under- <br />stood that the filling; station proposition and Mr. Tlorton <br />understood that the filling station was going to be on the <br />other side of the Turnpike and he did not object. kfterwards <br />when he found that it was to be right opposite his driveway, <br />he did nbject. Mr. Mason said that at the first board of <br />Appeals hearing before the Board, he objected on behalf <br />of Mr. Norton. At the Town Meeting, Childs' attorney made <br />a statement that Mr. Norton was in favor of this location <br />which was absolutely wrong, and he considered that misrepre- <br />sentation. Mr. Childs applied for a filling station and <br />that had gone through. They did not want to object to every- <br />thing, but a salesroom would mean the selling of cars which <br />would be on display and would mean that people would be <br />coming there to trade cars. They would not want an automo- <br />bile graveyard at their front door and there is no question <br />but that there will be used cars there that have been traded <br />in and left. Mr. Beason said that they very strongly opposed <br />the granting of this permit for the maintenance of a sales- <br />room. <br />' Mr. Neil H. Borden stated that he followed Mr. Mason as <br />one of the two people most intimately affected by this matter <br />outside of Mr. Childs. What Mr. Childs is asking for is <br />their loss. It is a question of a privilege being given one <br />man in contrast to what is being taken away from others. He <br />said that this matter had been bandied back and forth so much <br />that it had got to be an old story. Mr. Borden said that as <br />a person being most affected, he had been in a very bad <br />position all along and he thought that the matter should be <br />determined upon the merits of the question. The FlanninE <br />Board presented a plan for the development of the highway and <br />they thought that it was a good plan and they got the best <br />of expert advice in laying it out. the Town voted to permit <br />a filling station to go in at this location and he accepted <br />that. They then tried to save as much of that plan as they <br />could and they presented the idea of the T.1 zone designed to <br />keep the highway free from all business other than that ess- <br />ential to the hi�iway. They thought gasoline stations were <br />essential to the highway but they did not want them on corners. <br />The filling station is going in at the corner of Watertown <br />Street and the new highway, and to permit any other business <br />to be combined with it, tends to increase the danger hazard. <br />Mr. Borden said that a showroom meant a salesroom and if it <br />did not Mr. Childs would not want it to go in there. He <br />did not think that it was for the best interests of the Town <br />to allow it. Mr. Borden said thatthere was another phase <br />to be considered, which was the protection of real estate values <br />