1935-06-28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

138 Mr. Thomas Heaney of 570 Marrett Road stated that he believed that there was an error in the notice of the hearing that he had received and the Chairman explained that there had been a cler- ical error. Mr. Heaney stated that he lived within 100 feet of the property in questionand was the nearest abutter and h@ objected to the granting of the petition. The chairman inquired if Heaney would object if the.Hanna- ford's were making; an application, and Heaney stated that he could not object, that they already had a permit long before the Zoning Law went into effect. Louise M. Hannaford stated that the land nearest the Bray property was owned by one Josephine Merton, a secretary in the office of Mr. John Waugh's attorney. The Chairman asked if there were any more persons desiring to speak and as there were not, he declared the hearing closed and stated that the matter would be taken under advisement. ' The Chairman stated that Mrs. Baker did not have a lease Miss Annex A. Hannaford of Middleby Road, Lexington, spo$e in opposition to the granting of the petition. Miss Hannaford , stated that she had been operatin` a roadside stand on the prop- erty in question for twenty-five years and was there re 4�iigd that n 2 1�g q e1 tB Abwelpttinto effect s e appeared granted to do be ore he oa d f elec men and s e was a permit business even though her property was outside of the business area, with the provision that the permit was never to be used after the Hannaford family died out. She stated that the area involved had a frontage of 275 feet and was 390 feet deep. Her sister, Louise M. Hannaford, had paid 43000. for the property and two years ago Mr. John Waugh took a mortgafTe in the amount of 5;1200. Some time in January of this year, Waugh foreclosed the mortga-e and claimed, therefor, that he was the owner of the property. Miss Hannaford stated that her sister had six months in which to redeem the property and that this time is not yet up, and that she was endeavoring to procure X1200. in order to rea4em it. When Waugh took a mortgage on the property, Miss Hannaford gave him the deed to the place and Waugh promised to erect a new stand and even furnished a plan of the same. Some time ago however, during the night, he erected a small shack, and according to the Hannaford sisters, this building was erected without a permit. The Chairman informed Miss Hannaford that that matter a.id not affect this Board. Miss Louise M. Hannaford stated that she objected to the , granting of the permit; that she still had right of redemption and was endeavoring to met the property back; that she felt that the Board should not grant the permit until the question of the title was definitely settled. Mr. Thomas Heaney of 570 Marrett Road stated that he believed that there was an error in the notice of the hearing that he had received and the Chairman explained that there had been a cler- ical error. Mr. Heaney stated that he lived within 100 feet of the property in questionand was the nearest abutter and h@ objected to the granting of the petition. The chairman inquired if Heaney would object if the.Hanna- ford's were making; an application, and Heaney stated that he could not object, that they already had a permit long before the Zoning Law went into effect. Louise M. Hannaford stated that the land nearest the Bray property was owned by one Josephine Merton, a secretary in the office of Mr. John Waugh's attorney. The Chairman asked if there were any more persons desiring to speak and as there were not, he declared the hearing closed and stated that the matter would be taken under advisement. ' The Chairman stated that Mrs. Baker did not have a lease