Laserfiche WebLink
Letter was received from J. Pollard Hayden in which he <br />opposed the operation of the club on past experiences with <br />' clubs in that location. <br />The Board in private session, gave consideration to the <br />matter and voted to deny the petition in the following form: <br />The Board of Appeals, acting under General Laws Chapter <br />40, sec. 27, having received a written petition addressed <br />to it by The Castle Club, Inc.,, John E. Harrington, Pres., <br />a copy of which is hereto annexed, held a public hearing <br />thereon of which notice was mailed to the petitioner and to <br />the owners of all property deemed by the Board to be gffQcted <br />thereby as they appear on the most recent local tax list, and <br />also advertised in the Lexington Minute -Man, a newspaper <br />published in Lexington, which hearing was held in the <br />Selectmen's Room, in the Town Office Building, on December 7,. <br />1934 at 8:00 P.M. <br />A majority of the members of the Board of Appeals were <br />present at the hearing. A certificate of notice is hereto <br />annexed. At this hearing evidence was offered on behalf of <br />th= petitioner tending to show: that Mr. Ryder was unable <br />to obtain any income from the property and that Mr. Harrington <br />had made an application to Mr. Ryder to rent the premises on <br />behalf of the Castle Club, a club chartered under the <br />Massachusetts Laws, with an entrance fee for members of <br />' $25.00 and annual dues of $10.00. There is also a provision <br />for voting members who hold stock of the Club. The Club <br />now had a location at Gardner, Mass._ and had formerly been <br />located in Westminster, Mass; that no one other than members <br />and their guests would be entitled to the use of the facilities <br />of the club; that they propose to use the property as a dining <br />and social clubhouse serving food and liquor. <br />Evidence was offered on behalf of citizens opposing the <br />granting of the said petition tending to show that they had <br />purchased homes in the neighborhood with the idea that it <br />would be maintained as a strictly residential district; <br />that they had been greatly annoyed when the property had formerly <br />been occupied by clubs from automobiles leaving the premises <br />late at night; that Cary Avenue and'Shade Street are narrow <br />streets without sidewalks and would be more dangerous with <br />many automobiles leaving the club at night. There was also <br />objection raised to permitting the sale of liquor in a <br />district of so many homes and so many children, and to the erection <br />of a Neon sign. <br />At the close of the hearing the Board in private session <br />gave consideration to the subject of the petition and voted <br />unanimously in favor of the following findings: <br />1. That in its judgment the public convenience and <br />' welfare will not be substantially served by the making of <br />the exception requested. <br />