Laserfiche WebLink
41 <br />BOARD OF APPEALS MFETING <br />I <br />JUNE 11th, 1934. <br />A meeting of the Board of Appeals was held in the <br />Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, at 7:30 P.M. <br />Messrs. Maddison, Glynn and Robbins were present. Mr. <br />Hatch and Mr. Ferguson were not present. The secretary, <br />Helen C. Whittemore, was also present. <br />In regard to the application of James A. Guthrie for <br />variance of the application of 6 (b) R.1 Districts of the <br />Zoning Law, it was voted to deny the application in the <br />following form: <br />The Board of Appeals, acting under General Laws <br />Chapter 40, sec. 27, having received a written petition <br />addressed to it by James A. Guthrie, a copy of which is <br />hereto annexed, held a public hearing thereon of which <br />notice was mailed to the petitioner and to the owners of all. <br />property deemed by the Board to be affected thereby as they <br />appear on the most recent local tax list, and also advertised <br />in the Lexington Minute -Man, a newspaper published in Lexington <br />which hearing was held in the Selectmen's Room, in the Town <br />Office Building on the eighteenth day of May, 1934. <br />All of the members of the Board of Appeals were present <br />at the hearing. A certificate of notice is hereto annexed. <br />At this hearing evidence was offered on behalf of the petitioner <br />tending to show: that the club known as the Liberty Heights <br />Improvement Association had been in existence for several <br />years, and had recently changed its name to the Community <br />Club of Fast Lexington, and was an unincorporated body being <br />simply a group of residents in the neighborhood who had <br />organized themselves into a club for social purposes. The <br />land was to be given to the club by Mr. Clarence MacPhee <br />and it was hoped to raise a sufficient amount of money to <br />provide materials and fixtures to build a club house, the <br />labor being contributed. <br />Evidence was offered on behalf of citizens opposing <br />the granting of the said petition tending to show that <br />the granting of the petition in a residential neighborhood <br />would depreciate the value of their property, and the <br />probable use of the club house for social affairs might <br />result in considerable noise and become a nuisance. <br />At the close of the hearing the Board in private session <br />June 11th, 1934, gave consideration to the subject of the <br />petition and voted unanimously in favor of the following <br />findings: <br />' 1. That.in its judgment the public convenience and <br />welfare will not be substantially served by the making of <br />the exception requested. <br />