1934-06-05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

35 The Chairman of the Selectmen opened the hearing and the Clerk of the Board of Appeals read the notice of the hearing of the Board of Appeals. Mrs. Fanny P. Crown of Curve Street was present and stated that the land owned by her father was in the business zone and was a corner lot and he desired to get some revenue from the property, having paid taxes on it for quite a number Of years. She presented plan showing what would be proposed to be placed on the lot providing the permit was granted. She stated that they planned to lease the property and have someone construct the building thereon. Mr. Maddison called attention to the fact that a similar petition was filed one year ago and inquired of Piss. Crown if the conditions had changed there any since she had made her prelious application which the Board refused. She stated that there were no changes, simply that the property was in ' a business zone and her father would like to be reimbursed for some of the expense of holding the property and she thought that there was no objection to the permit being granted. She stated, also, that stores could hardly be placed there because there were already sufficient stores across the street. Mr. Maddison called attention to the fact that the more filling stations there were, the more objection there would be relative to the safety of children. Mr. Roland Baldrey of 1093 Mass. Avenue appeared and stated that he would like to register his objection to the granting of the permit. He felt that this application was a perennial event and he did not think conditions were any different than they were before. He also called attention to the fact that the applicant opposed the filling station of Pichette and Ahern. He felt that there being a lot of traffic that it would be a detriment to the neighbors. He felt that although the land is in a business district that there is a residential district adjoining and he felt that in objecting that he was objecting for the interests of the Town as a whole. No other persons appeared in favor or against and the hearing was declared closed and the matter taken under advisement by the Board. ' A true record, Attest: Clerk. BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING. JUNE 5th, 1934. ;+ Joint hearing of the Board of Appeals_ and the Board of, Selectmen was declared open on the application of Fanny P. Crown for permission to have a gasoline filling station at 859_863 Mass. Avenue, at the corner of Curve Street. Messrs. Maddison, Glynn, Ferguson, Robbins and Hatch were present. The Chairman of the Selectmen opened the hearing and the Clerk of the Board of Appeals read the notice of the hearing of the Board of Appeals. Mrs. Fanny P. Crown of Curve Street was present and stated that the land owned by her father was in the business zone and was a corner lot and he desired to get some revenue from the property, having paid taxes on it for quite a number Of years. She presented plan showing what would be proposed to be placed on the lot providing the permit was granted. She stated that they planned to lease the property and have someone construct the building thereon. Mr. Maddison called attention to the fact that a similar petition was filed one year ago and inquired of Piss. Crown if the conditions had changed there any since she had made her prelious application which the Board refused. She stated that there were no changes, simply that the property was in ' a business zone and her father would like to be reimbursed for some of the expense of holding the property and she thought that there was no objection to the permit being granted. She stated, also, that stores could hardly be placed there because there were already sufficient stores across the street. Mr. Maddison called attention to the fact that the more filling stations there were, the more objection there would be relative to the safety of children. Mr. Roland Baldrey of 1093 Mass. Avenue appeared and stated that he would like to register his objection to the granting of the permit. He felt that this application was a perennial event and he did not think conditions were any different than they were before. He also called attention to the fact that the applicant opposed the filling station of Pichette and Ahern. He felt that there being a lot of traffic that it would be a detriment to the neighbors. He felt that although the land is in a business district that there is a residential district adjoining and he felt that in objecting that he was objecting for the interests of the Town as a whole. No other persons appeared in favor or against and the hearing was declared closed and the matter taken under advisement by the Board. ' A true record, Attest: Clerk.