Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />133 <br />NOTICE <br />Lexington, bass. <br />May 20, 1931. <br />The Board of Appeals will hold a hearing on the <br />matter of "tarring the application of the Zoning Law by <br />permitting the use of the property situated on Waltham <br />Street and owned by Isabella Fardy under Section 9 F <br />of the Lexington Zoning By-law for a permit for a road- <br />side stand on the said premises for the sale of products <br />grown by Frank Dias of Concord Avenue, Lexington, and <br />in accordance with Chapter 133 of the Acts of 1924. <br />The hearing will be held June 5, 1931 at the <br />Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building at 8:15 o'clock P.M. <br />Arthur N. Maddison <br />Chairman, Board of Appeals <br />The Board voted to pass the following orddr granting <br />permission to Mary A. Whelan to permit a tea room and <br />tourist accommodations: <br />The Board of Appeals, acting under General Laws, <br />Chapter 40, sec. 27, having received a writ en petition <br />addressed to it by Mary A. Whelan, 259 Bedford St., <br />Lexington, a copy of which is hereto annexed, held a <br />public hearing thereon of which notice was mailed to M. A. Whelan <br />the petitioner and to the owners of all property deemed 'order" <br />by the Board to be affected thereby as they appear <br />on the most recent local tax list, and also advertised <br />in the Lexington Times -Minute Man, a newspaper published <br />in Lexington, which hearing was held in the Selectmen's <br />Room in the own Office Building on Friday, the 19th day <br />day of June, 1931 at eight o'clock P.M. A majority of <br />the members of the Board of Appeals were present at <br />the hearing. <br />After hearing the evidence offered by the petitioner <br />and such other evidence as was offered, the Board in <br />private session at a meeting held June 28, 1931, gave <br />consideration to the subject of the petition and a <br />majority of the Board voted that in its judgment the <br />public convenience and welfare will be substantially <br />served by the use of the premises described in the <br />petition and that such use will not tend to impair <br />the status of the neighborhood. <br />The Board therefore determines that the application <br />