Laserfiche WebLink
November 7, 2005 Special Town Meeting, cont.... <br /> 8:50 p.m. Members spoke in support and opposition. <br /> 9:09 p.m. Ruth Thomas, pr.4, spoke on zoning and moved the following Amendment: <br /> AMENDMENT: <br /> In Section IV of the PSDUP, OTHER ZONING PROVISIONS, in the Sub-Section OFF-STREET PARKING <br /> AND LOADING, Item 5 be replaced by the following: <br /> 5)The required parking spaces for the commercial space to be constructed under this PDSUP shall be as follows: <br /> a)One parking space for every 325 s.f. of commercial space shall be available only for commercial space <br /> owners,lessees and their employees. Total 18. [UNCHANGED] <br /> b)Each commercial user shall be assigned the number of spaces in the garage corresponding to the parking <br /> factor of one space for every 325 s.f. [b,c,d&e are NEW] <br /> c)The minimum number of off-street parking spaces required for each individual use of the commercial <br /> space in the CD-Planned Commercial District created under this PSDUP shall be the same number as that <br /> specified in the 2005 Zoning By-Law for the same commercial use in the CB District. Accordingly, if a <br /> particular use requires more than one parking space for every 325 s.f,the user shall have to demonstrate to the <br /> satisfaction of the Building Commissioner or designee that the required number of additional off-street parking <br /> spaces will be provided outside the garage. <br /> d)If a new Zoning By-Law, enacted in the future,reduces the number of required off-street parking spaces <br /> for a particular commercial use in the CB District,then at the applicant's request,the Board of Appeals may grant <br /> a Special Permit to reduce the off-street parking requirements for that particular commercial use in this CD- <br /> Planned Commercial District to conform to the provisions for the same use applicable to the CB District in the <br /> modified Zoning By-Law. <br /> e)A change in commercial use shall trigger a review by the Zoning Enforcement Officer to validate that the <br /> number of spaces being provided for the proposed commercial use meets the parking requirements specified <br /> herein. <br /> 9:12 p.m. Ruth Thomas explained proposed amendment. <br /> 9:16 p.m. John Farrington, Attorney for proponent, spoke in support of amendment. <br /> 9:20 p.m. Charles Hornig reported opposition by a majority of the Planning Board. <br /> 9:25 p.m. Standing vote on the amendment tallied as follows: <br /> Precinct Yes No <br /> 1 2 14 <br /> 2 4 11 <br /> 3 4 12 <br /> 4 5 13 <br /> 5 6 10 <br /> 6 3 15 <br /> 7 1 17 <br /> 8 3 13 <br /> 9 2 10 <br /> At Large 2 9 <br /> Total 32 124 <br /> 9:29 p.m. Amendment Not Adopted. <br /> 9:29 p.m. Members and residents spoke in support and opposition of the main motion. <br /> 9:50 p.m. Tourism Committee Chairman Dawn McKenna reported the committee took no <br /> stand on the motion. <br /> 10:00 p.m. Michael Martignetti, pr.4, moved the question. Motion Adopted. <br /> 10:01 p.m. Standing vote on the main motion tallied as follows: <br /> Precinct Yes No <br /> 1 10 8 <br /> 2 13 3 <br /> 3 14 5 <br /> 4 17 2 <br /> 5 11 6 <br /> 6 16 4 <br /> 7 20 0 <br /> 8 14 2 <br /> 9 13 4 <br /> At Large 11 1 <br /> Total 139 35 <br /> 10:08 p.m. Motion Adopted. <br /> 10:09 p.m. Jerold Michelson, pr.5, served Notice of Reconsideration on Article 2. <br />