Laserfiche WebLink
and current procedures used in developing the Capital Budget. Mr. Hornig <br /> explained the article is a resolution as to how Town Meeting wants the Capital <br /> Budget to work. It is only advice to the Town Manager and Selectmen and is <br /> non - binding. <br /> Part A: <br /> 9:15 p.m. Selectmen Chairman Peter Enrich explained that the Board has <br /> struggled over this proposal, enthusiastically supporting the efforts and <br /> approach of the Capital Expenditures Committee for its valuable work but has <br /> serious concerns on specifics of the motion and timing for implementation. <br /> Mr. Enrich reported the Selectmen did not support the motion at this time and <br /> asks that the Board of Selectmen and Committees iron out details to agree <br /> upon a method of attack to which they can commit. Mr. Enrich expressed <br /> great gratitude on behalf of the entire Board of Selectmen to Mr. Coit, Mr. <br /> Hornig, and Mr. Hamburger. <br /> Mr. Enrich explained the perceived problems as follows: <br /> Detailed specific aspects of the proposed resolution; substantive <br /> problems on the way in which resolution is structured — discretionary, <br /> scope, etc.; resolution attempts to commit a path of specific amounts <br /> of spending and it is unclear as to ability to address other budget <br /> aspects. <br /> 9:24 p.m. Jonathan Lederman, pr.7, spoke in favor of the resolution. <br /> 9:25 p.m. Ephraim Weiss, pr.5, spoke in favor of the resolution. <br /> 9:26 p.m. Albert Zabin, pr. 1, explained he saw this as a difficult issue <br /> which is more significant than a non - binding resolution, seeing it as a <br /> statement of policies and priorities, and of his concern about priorities which <br /> have been left off. <br /> 9:29 p.m. Thomas Diaz, pr.2, spoke in support of PART A and <br /> questioned if the proponents see it realistic to expect level spending yearly. <br /> Charles Hornig explained they chose the categories selected for items which <br /> occurred frequently which could be evened out independent of the <br /> stabilization fund. <br /> 9:33 p.m. Robert Rotberg, pr.3, stating his critical point that the motion <br /> is privileging certain expenditures over others. <br /> 9:34 p.m. Mr. Rotberg moved to refer to the Board of Selectmen and 2 <br /> Finance Committees. <br /> 9:34 p.m. The Moderator called a 5 minute recess. <br /> 9:41 p.m. The Moderator called the meeting to order. <br /> 9:41 p.m. Steve Coit, Appropriation Committee, reported the majority of <br /> the Appropriation Committee is not in favor of the motion to refer and views <br /> the article as a non - binding article which leaves great latitude. <br /> 9:43 p.m. Bruce Collier, pr.3, urged support of the motion to refer, for <br /> more study. <br /> 9:44 p.m. Charles Hornig, Capital Expenditures Committee, reported the <br /> Committee was unanimously against referral. <br /> 9:44 p.m. Paul Chernick, pr.6, opposed referral. <br /> 9:45 p.m. Sue Cusack, pr.9, opposed referral. <br /> 9:46 p.m. David Kanter, pr.7, opposed referral. <br /> 9:46 p.m. Margaret Rawls, pr.4, opposed referral. <br /> 9:47 p.m. Alan Lazarus, pr.6, supported referral. <br /> Adjourned Session 1998 Annual Town Meeting, cont.... - April 29, 1998 <br /> 9:47 p.m. Robert Whitman, pr.8, supported referral. <br />