Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals <br />Selectmen’s Meeting Room <br />September 28, 2017 <br />Board Members Present: Chairwoman, Jeanne K. Krieger, Edward D. McCarthy, <br />David G. Williams, Martha C. Wood, and Ralph D. Clifford <br />Alternate Present: Nyles N. Barnert <br />Administrative Staff: David George, Zoning Administrator <br />Address: 16 South Rindge Road <br />The petitioner submitted the following information with the application: Nature and <br />Justification, Topographic Plan, Plot Plan, and Floor Plans. <br />Prior to the meeting, the petitions and supporting data were reviewed by the Building <br />Commissioner, Conservation Administrator, Town Engineer, Board of Selectmen, the <br />Planning Director, the Historic District Commission Clerk, Historical Commission, <br />Economic Development, and the Zoning Administrator. Comments were received <br />from the Building Commissioner, Conservation Administrator, Planning Office, and <br />Zoning Administrator. <br />The petitioner is requesting a VARIANCE in accordance with the Zoning By-Law <br />(Chapter 135 of the Code of Lexington) sections 135-9.2.2.2 and 135-4.1.1, Table 2 <br />(Schedule of Dimensional Controls), to allow a side yard setback of 11.4 ft instead of <br />the allowable 15 ft. <br />The Chairwoman opened the hearing at 8:14 pm. <br />The applicant, Mr. Walter Scott, presented the application. He is proposing to add a <br />third bay to his 2-car garage. He currently has 5 cars and his current garage can only <br />fit 1 car, and his shed is full. During snow storms, the additional cars don’t fit into the <br />driveway and block the snow plows and block people from walking by. They looked at <br />other options for placement of the garage, but they would still have had to get a <br />variance. They also looked at putting the location of the garage in the back, but there <br />is a propane tank buried there and electrical panels that would be in the way. Mr. <br />Scott stated that he has a hardship because of the shape of the lot. He has 125’ <br />frontage and his house is 66’ long. Because the lot is at an angle, it makes it difficult <br />to keep the garage within the setback. There is only a small porition of the garage that <br />would be in the setback. <br />A Board Member, Mr. David G. Williams, asked if the shed is outside of the 15’ <br />setback (yes). Mr. Williams stated that this is a self-imposed hardship. <br />Mr. Barnert stated that they have had applicants come before them asking for a <br />variance to have a garage when they don’t have one at all, and they have been <br />denied. Mr. Barnert asked the applicant why it is a hardship to have a two car garage <br />(Mr. Scott responded that he would like to be able to put 3 cars in the garage so he <br />doesn’t have to block the sidewalk). <br /> Page 7 <br /> <br />