|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2017-10-16-CEC-STM2-STM3-rpt
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
ELECTIONS AND TOWN MEETING ACTION & WARRANTS
>
Town Meeting Minutes and Reports
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
Reports
>
2017-10-16-CEC-STM2-STM3-rpt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 4:22:16 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 1:51:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2017
Author or Source
Capital Expenditures Committee
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Town Meeting CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO OCTOBER 16, 2017, STMs 2017-2 & -3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO OCTOBER 16,2017, STMs 2017-2&-3 <br /> Project Description(CPA Category) Amount Requested Funding Source Committee Recommends <br /> (a) Supplemental Funding for <br /> Affordable Housing at 52 Lowell Not Applicable Not Applicable Indefinite Postponement <br /> Street(Community Housing) (7-0) <br /> LexHAB plans to move this Article for Indefinite Postponement. An architect has been hired and it is <br /> anticipated that LexHAB will have firm estimates for the total cost for this 6-unit project after the <br /> completion of construction documents. At that time, an Article could be included in the 2018 Annual <br /> Town Meeting to request whatever supplemental funding is needed. <br /> Project Description(CPA Category) Amount Funding Committee Recommends <br /> Requested Source <br /> (b) Purchase of 44 Adams Street <br /> Property(Open Space) Unknown CPF Pending <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> At the time of this report, the CPC had not decided on its recommendation to this Special Town Meeting <br /> on the use of CPF. <br /> If a CPC recommendation is made, it would be that CPF be appropriated for the purchase of <br /> approximately 27,600 square feet of land abutting the Town-owned Chiesa Farm conservation land at <br /> 44 Adams Street with the dollar amount of any use of CPF for the purchase is capped by a formal <br /> assessment's value. (The cap is by statute.) CPF could also be use for legal expenses, including those for <br /> the preparation of a conservation restriction; a land survey and plan; deed recording; and to pay a non- <br /> Town entity to hold, monitor, and enforce the conservation restriction on the land. <br /> The parcel of land to be acquired abuts the south edge of the Chiesa Farm, facing Adams Street, and is <br /> zoned RO (residential development). Until recently it contained a single family home. The lot and <br /> structure were purchased by a developer who took down the existing house in order to build a larger <br /> house in its place. In addition to the purchase price of$850,000, the developer expended money on site <br /> work and building design and on razing the previously existing structure. It is believed that the developer <br /> is willing to sell the parcel to the Town as long as he is compensated for his out-of-pocket expenditures <br /> and a reasonable portion of his expected profit. <br /> The Chiesa Farm meadow is owned by the Town as conservation land and is accessible to the public. It is <br /> one of the few remaining examples of Lexington's agrarian history, and one of the Town's most attractive <br /> vistas. It currently occupies approximately 23 acres, bordered on each side by twentieth century <br /> residences and a barn. Purchase of the additional parcel of land would expand the conservation land by <br /> approximately 0.69 acres and is supported by the Conservation Commission. As open space, the purchase <br /> is eligible for CPF, but only up to the appraised value of the land. Because of the investment already <br /> made by the developer, the purchase price to the Town may exceed the appraised value of the parcel by a <br /> considerable margin. Therefore, if the Town elects to make this purchase it would have to seek a portion <br /> of the funding from some source other than CPF. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Before recommending use of CPF, this Committee prefers to review the CPC's current finance-projection <br /> model showing existing and projected balances for each statutory funding reserve, unbudgeted reserve <br /> balances, and previously approved and projected debt-service obligations for each funding category over <br /> the near term. At the time of this report, an updated projection model was not available. Without it, the <br /> Committee cannot judge whether the proposed appropriation would be prudent at this time,particularly as <br /> it appears to require significant co-funding from sources other than the CPF. <br /> At the time of this report, this Committee was awaiting the CPC's decision with regard to this proposed <br /> request. <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.