Laserfiche WebLink
<br />building itself does not require a sprinkler system based on its use and it is highly unusual to <br />have a system like this. The Chief asked – is it safe – it’s as safe as Cary Hall is, he said. The <br />Chief further stated that they need a very aggressive campaign with realistic limits. <br />4. Wendy Manz, CPC, asked if there is a range of costs or is this the minimum needed to install a <br />system. Chief Middlemiss responded that this is the cost if it was to be installed today. <br />Approximately $100,000 should be factored in for inflation costs. <br />5. David Kanter, Capital Expenditures Committee, asked if you factor in all the grandfathering, is <br />the building compliant? Chief Middlemiss responded that under current standards, they are <br />required to have the system inspected but not tested. <br />6. Unknown person said they want confidence that a licensed inspector has inspected the system. <br />Chief Middlemiss said as far as operations go, they have met with the folks at Munroe to <br />address areas needing to be cleared and they have imposed storage limits. He also said that his <br />staff has gone into this building more than ever trying as best they can in the conditions they <br />have. <br />7. David Kanter, Capital Expenditures Committee, mentioned that they have lots of <br />documentation. <br />8. Sue Cusack, from the Committee on Disability, asked if work on the fire suppression system <br />trips ADA requirements. The response was that there is a fair amount of ADA work that <br />should be looked at. <br />9. Richard Pagett, CPC, spoke in follow-up to Sue Cusack. He asked at what point do we obligate <br />ourselves to do a full renovation? Someone responded that it is triggered by a percentage of <br />total building value. Richard stated that the paper did not include ADA issues. Carl Valente <br />said that the engineering study included building systems and building envelope only. <br />10. David Kanter, Capital Expenditures Committee, asked how long the project would take once it <br />was kicked off. The Chief responded 2-3 weeks to remove the old system and less than a <br />month to put the new one in. <br /> <br /> <br />At this point, the meeting returned to agenda item #9 – Stone Building Renovation (Library). Connie <br />Rawson shared that the East Lexington Branch Library suffered a flood in August 2007 and that the <br />Trustees are waiting on a report before making a decision on how to proceed. There are two parts to <br />the process – one, an evaluation of the Stone Building as a municipally owned structure and two, a <br />decision for what should occur within the structure. The Trustees are currently waiting for the report <br />and plan to have a public hearing in the first quarter of 2008. No further questions were asked. <br /> <br />Regarding other business, CPC Chair, Betsey Weiss announced that the requested amount for the <br />Archive Record Management and Conservation Project put forth by the Town Clerk had been revised <br />from $35,000 to $150,000. In response to this announcement, David Kanter commented that he was <br />delighted to learn that the comments previously made on this project had been addressed. <br /> <br />Betsey Weiss adjourned the Public Hearing at 8:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br /> <br />Judy Pearson <br />Administrative Assistant to the CPC <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Public Meeting 12.20.07 Minutes – FINAL 1.16.08 6 <br />