Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Lexington Permanent Building Committee Meeting <br />Maria Hastings Elementary School Building Project <br />SBC MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />DATE OF MEETING: June 5, 2017 at 7:00P.M. at 201 Bedford Street, Lexington MA <br /> <br />PROJECT: Maria Hastings Elementary School Building Project <br /> Dore & Whittier Project #MP16-0112 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: School Building Committee Meeting (D&W#11) <br /> <br />ATTENDING: Jon Himmel Lexington PBC Chair <br />Curt Barrentine Lexington PBC <br />Charles Favazzo Lexington PBC <br />Carl Oldenburg Lexington PBC <br />Richard Perry Lexington PBC <br />Howard Hobbs Lexington PBC <br />Mark Barrett Lexington DPF <br />Louise Lipsitz School Principal <br />Trip Elmore DWMP <br />Rachel Milaschewski DWMP <br />Donna DiNisco DiNisco Design <br />Ken DiNisco DiNisco Design <br />Vivian Low DiNisco Design <br /> <br />---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />1. Call to order at 7:05 <br /> <br />M. Barrett handed out the Meeting Minutes from the 5/5 and 5/11 PBC Meetings, which the <br />Committee agreed to table until the next scheduled PBC Meeting on 6/14 for further review. <br /> <br />2. Review of Project Estimate <br /> <br />D. DiNisco began by explaining that a good portion of last week was spent reviewing the estimates <br />from both A. M. Fogarty (third party estimator), and Walsh Brothers, adding that they will be carrying <br />building itself has not shifted from a cost perspective, but there are many characteristics to the site <br />which create a challenge, and in turn increases cost; some of these characteristics being the <br />topography, storm water management parameters, need for large retaining walls, etc. <br /> <br />D. DiNisco went on to say that the estimates were close to a 7% difference at the end of the day <br />Friday, adding that the project team has spent a lot of time reconciling. Furthermore, she stated that <br />Walsh wanted a couple more days to fine-tune some of their numbers, and added that she is <br />confident they will get to a number that is agreed upon. <br /> <br />Additionally, D. DiNisco explained that the project team had begun to put together a VE Log to bring <br />the number down; they had gone through a series of adjustments to simplify some areas of design to <br />be more cost effective. One major adjustment that is currently being explored is a ~15% rotation of <br />the building away from the abutter property lines, which could allow them to avoid any easements, <br />perform a smaller amount of blasting, and less of a retaining wall on the north side of the property. <br />The Committee then began to review the VE items, and D. DiNisco reassured that none of these <br />items would affect the educational program, maintenance, operations, or function of the building; she <br />added that most of them <br /> <br />