|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2024-03-14-LBAC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Lexington Bicycle Advisory Committee-LBAC
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
2024-03-14-LBAC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2024 10:43:51 AM
Creation date
4/30/2024 4:49:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2024
Author or Source
Betty Gau, Committee Member
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Town Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
requested to be included in the roundabout by this Bicycle Advisory Committee. <br />Mr. Morrow displayed the current plan, highlighting the bike ramps. There are 4 bike ramps on <br />roundabout. The abutter has claims that there is too much impervious paving that was created <br />as part of the roundabout. The abutter proposes eliminating impervious pavement. <br /> <br />Betty Gau noted that the Commission on Disability already reviewed these two proposed <br />changes to the roundabout and voted unanimously to maintain the roundabout as it is currently <br />designed. <br /> <br />Tom Shiple stated that he was not part of the bike committee when the bike ramps were <br />discussed but he did a site visit to look at them. He did not realize the bike ramps were part of <br />the design. He understands that not all people feel comfortable riding through the roundabout. <br />His first reaction was that the ramps were overkill. He stated that he observed that the <br />roundabout lane is very narrow and too narrow for a car and a bike at the cross walk section of <br />the roundabout. He stated that he has concluded that the current bike ramps are absolutely <br />necessary. <br /> <br />Sarah Hews: I am in full support of the bike ramps but don’t understand why it’s a problem. <br /> <br />Ross Morrow: The DPW prefers that the design stays as is. They were told by the abutter that <br />the panels that are required on the ramps, look odd and don’t follow with Battle Green Master <br />Plan. <br /> <br />Sarah Hews: For the safety of cyclists, it is necessary to have the ramps that provide an <br />alternative for those cyclists that do not feel comfortable or safe riding around the roundabout <br />alongside the cars. The bike ramps are for the bikers and the pedestrian crossings are there for <br />the public to use. The ramps are for our most vulnerable users and are necessary. <br /> <br />Ross Morrow: We were told by the abutter that the panels look odd and the town is not used to <br />having them because the bike raps are not as common in town. The abutter is concerned that <br />the ramp is skewed and there might be confusion with pedestrians to accidentally use the <br />ramps. The panels have to be there per disability regulations. <br /> <br />Mike Tabaczynski: The design is very well done and the green line (shown on Ross’s design
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.