2024-03-25-ConCom-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Project: razing and reconstruction of a single- family home and installation of bituminous concrete driveway and stormwater infiltration system within the 100-foot buffer zone to Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Documentation Submitted:  Notice of Intent Application; Prepared by: D. Michael, Marsh Matters Environmental; Date: 3/5/2024;  “Plan for Proposed Building and Average Natural Grade Worksheet”; Prepared and Stamped by: William E. Tirrell, PLS#49930; Date: 3/5/2024;  “Proposed Utility Site Plan, Proposed Infiltration System Details, and Proposed Construction Details”; Prepared and Stamped by Patrick L. Bower, CE#48026; Date 3/5/2024  Stormwater Management Report; Stamped by Patrick L. Bower, CE#48026; Prepared by Amoskeag Engineering Consultants, PLLC; Date 12/21/23; Date Last Revised 3/4/2024  Form 11 – Soil Sustainability Assessment for On-Site Drainage System; Prepared by Greg Saab; Date 12/15/2023  Bordering Vegetated Wetland Determination Form; Prepared by: MME, M. Ball, Wetland Sci.; Date: 8/24/2023  “NOI Cover Letter”; Prepared by: Michael Ball, Sr. Wetland Scientist, Marsh Matters Environmental; Date: 3/5/2024 Mr. Mike Ball, Marsh Matters Environmental, presented, on behalf of the applicant, the proposal to raze and rebuild a single-family dwelling. Mr. Patrick Bower, civil engineer, and Mr. Renan Barreto, applicant, were also in attendance. Mr. Ball stated that there will be no mature tree removal; however, pruning from trees nearest the new structure may be required. Mr. Barreto has created an architectural plan not submitted with the NOI. The architectural plan must be submitted on the record in order to be considered as part of the property’s plans. Mr. Bower presented the proposed stormwater management plan with stormwater mitigation through two Cultec infiltration systems and the permeable paver driveway. Mr. Bower also stated that new information about the calculations in the pre-development condition will be submitted. However, these calculations will not cause any changes to the proposed plans. The Commission had questions about the plan such as roof overhang and the plans around the pool which can be addressed once the architectural plan has been submitted to the record. Ms. Mullins asked for clarification that the pool is considered impervious in the calculations. Mr. Bower confirmed that the pool is considered impervious. On a motion by Ms. Ladd and seconded by Ms. Dohan, the Commission voted 7-0 by roll call vote to continue the hearing to the 4/8/2024 meeting, at the applicant’s request. Record of Vote as Follows: Kevin Beuttell – Aye Duke Bitsko – Aye Alex Dohan – Aye Ruth Ladd – Aye