|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1998-07-07-FTPG-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Four Town Planning Group-FTPG
>
Minutes
>
1998
>
1998-07-07-FTPG-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 1:40:33 PM
Creation date
4/9/2024 1:40:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
1998
Department
Select Board
Keywords or Subject
Four Town Planning Group
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rp r;P, <br /> DRAFT ' Minutes - Four Town Planning Group <br /> JUL 2 0 ma July 7, 1998 <br /> Present: Elizabeth t+lewman (Concord), Jeanne Krieger (Lexington), Kane Packard <br /> (Concoftl), Richard Walsh (MASSPORT), Greg Cravedi (HAFB), Chuck Enright (Concord), <br /> Lora Goldenberg (Bedford), James White (Lincoln), Bob Bowyer (Lexington), Richard <br /> Canale (Lexington), Mark Racicot (MAPC), Grace Perez (Concord), and Liza Cormier <br /> The Meetina was called to order at 4 45 by Kane Packard. <br /> JVIAPC Update <br /> Mark Racicot talked about the range of the build-out analysis as described in the RFP <br /> (3,000-30,000). He stated we need to specify if we want the whole four communities or just <br /> the 4TPG area (as mapped out in the Daylor Plan) in the analysis. We need to keep in <br /> mind the difference of a build-out analysis area and areas of development impact; areas <br /> impacted can be reviewed as we progress through this process. This boundary issue has <br /> been an issue for awhile and will be part of Task 1 from the RFP; the 4TPG will meet and <br /> define more clearly this boundary for Mark; it was noted that our vision can be broader than <br /> the actual boundary that we give to MAPC. We can refine these areas as we go through <br /> this process; once we begin to learn zoning regulations and better define build-out and label <br /> specific areas. Mark also asked us to clarify the build-out analysis - a small sampling from <br /> the area, more detailed areas, whether or not we want to include such specifics as buildings <br /> that can be torn down and rebuilt, developed/undeveloped parcels, conversions of existing <br /> commercial space, etc. Obviously, the fee for this build-out analysis is based on what areas <br /> we are looking to have in the analysis. Mark also needs to know our wetlands rules as they <br /> may apply to the parking/commercial sites. <br /> There was some discussion about whether we should be doing the technical portion of this <br /> project before defining areas; it was felt by most in attendance that the technical portion <br /> (defining zoning areas/regulations) was an integral part of defining areas. Lexington stated <br /> some examples why zoning research should be done before we define the areas that we <br /> want to have impacted; zoning is a statement of policy, it's a regulation, you need to know <br /> where you are. Bob Bowyer brought an example of a Lexington build-out for discussion and <br /> reference, he noted the time and effort involved in preparing this type of build-out. Mark did <br /> state that MAPC's analysis would be a little less detailed because they do build-outs on <br /> gross area, as opposed to Bob's example which was done by specific areas. <br /> Summary It was decided to use the 4TPA as defined by Daylor It was stated that we <br /> need an analysis with the highest and best uses; specifically office build-out was mentioned. <br /> It was agreed to have a wide range used for the build-out, i.e., commercial, tear-downs, etc. <br /> MASSPORT and HAFB parcels need to be reviewed and implemented into our build-out as <br /> necessary Developmental impacts, such as impacts of traffic, will not be covered by this <br /> build-out analysis, but can be generated from it, as an additional step to the process. The <br /> detail of final report will be dependent upon what areas we request. <br /> Open House <br /> Richard Canale discussed having a type of open house where we invite each town <br /> selectmen and interested parties to discuss our plans; perhaps in October/November <br /> Next Meetinas: The next meetings will be Wednesday, July 22 and Wednesday, August 5, <br /> at the Brick Building, Concord. <br /> Liza Cormier <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.