Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br /> 1 <br /> TRAFFIC ON HARRINGTON ROAD <br /> Chairperson Battin asked Mr Tonaszuck to present the case of traffic flow <br /> in and around the Bedford Street/Harrington Road intersection He stated that <br /> diverting traffic by re-opening Cammelia Place could create strong objections <br /> from neighbors and that the project needs professional study and guidance to <br /> determine the overall effect Mr Bowyer agreed that extensive study is needed <br /> in that area Mr Sacco and Mr Wells stated the possibility of re-opening Han- <br /> cock Ave . to Worthen Rd. and to set the 'wheels in motion' to inform Mr Gschwend- <br /> tner of the C.R C 's efforts to alleviate the problems at Bedford St and Harring- <br /> ton Rd <br /> Chairperson Battin accepted Mr Tonaszuck's offer to do an in-house study for <br /> a traffic plan <br /> November, 1983, was decided upon as a target date for all. traffic input <br /> Chairperson Battin discussed briefly the Baptist Chruch Parking Driveway plan <br /> and stated it was not within the jurisdiction of the C R C She suggested that <br /> Mr Tonaszuck talk with the concerned parties in the Church <br /> Mr Sacco made a recommendation that a sub-committee, consisting of Mr Tonas- <br /> zuck, Mr Bowyer, Mrs Bateson and himself be formed to discuss the parking survey <br /> recently conducted by the Lexington Chamber of Commerce Chairperson Battin asked <br /> that we interrupt our regular agenda to allow the Putnam Pantry representative to <br /> present his peititon for our review She introduced Mr Cala P Emerson, Jr. , <br /> President of Putnam Pantry Candies <br /> Mr Emerson proceeded to give us a brief history and background of his com- <br /> pany and its.development to date He reviewed his progress in becoming a tenant of <br /> the Lexington Square complex Of special interest to the C R C was the construc- <br /> tion of a fence at the rear of the Lexington Square parking area, the proprosed <br /> closing time of Putnam Pantry and the inclusion of take-out windows (2) at the rear <br /> of his establishment. Mr. Emerson stated that based on their past experience re- <br /> garding numbers of cars in their parking lots , he sees no parking problem develop- <br /> ing There will be from 1 to 6 employees on duty at any time - workers usually do <br /> not drive to their jobs - most traffic in shop during evening hours (7 to 9 P .M ) <br /> He wants the take-out windows as a convenience to customers <br /> Questions were then asked by various board members Mr Sorensen expressed <br /> concern about foot traffic and parking in the rear of the Square if the windows <br /> are permitted. Mr Wells asked if the take-out windows would really make a dif- <br /> ference in people congregatLng outside the premises <br /> Chairperson Battin suggested the hours of the window he restricted Mr Sacco <br /> requested information on the hours of the other similar establishments in Lexington <br /> in order to offer Putnam Pantry the same opportunity for serving its customers <br /> After all the information was available to the Committee, a vote was taken by <br /> Chairperson Battin. Recommendations of the C R C are as follows <br /> 1 C .R.0 unanimously agreed to the inclusion of a fence at the rear of <br /> Lexington Square <br /> 2 Voted 5 - 3 to eliminate take out windows <br /> 3 Voted - 6 in favor of allowing Putnam to remain open until 11 P.M <br /> Voted - 2 in favor of allowing Putnam to remain open until 10 P M <br />