|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1982-04-13-CRC-min.pdf
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Center Revitalization Committee-CRC
>
Reports
>
1982
>
1982-04-13-CRC-min.pdf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2024 2:28:21 PM
Creation date
4/8/2024 2:28:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
1982
Department
Select Board
Keywords or Subject
Center Revitalization Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 13 , 1982 Minutes of CBD Revitalization Committee Page 2 <br /> such as modifying the timing of traffic signals and the rerouting of <br /> traffic patterns in the municipal parking lots. RR also said that the <br /> Town might be able to perform a traffic count at the intersection of <br /> Waltham Street and Massachusetts Avenue. RB emphasized that in the end <br /> the $3, 000 were buying experience judgement. <br /> WT said that there was trouble defining what the results of the <br /> traffic survey were going to he. RB pointed out that private industry <br /> uses consultants regularly as part of defining appropriate actions of <br /> the business. <br /> JT wanted to know just how relevant were the old studies. RB said that <br /> the most recent studies were from 14 to 16 years old and might not be <br /> relevant today and that the new study was necessary. WT. added that the <br /> suggestions might enable the Town to "milk" some more capacity from <br /> the existing network of streets and parking areas. DO added that many <br /> factors had changed and the consultant could identify areas of <br /> improvements. MB suggested that the study could define new studies and I <br /> capital improvements. 41 <br /> RS wanted to know were the money was coming from for the study. RB <br /> said it was from the general fund and not the parking meter fund. <br /> Present Parking Program <br /> The committee then went on to discuss the present parking program. JT <br /> brought up the problem of unused spaces in the permit areas. FT <br /> answered that the problem was being investigated and corrective <br /> measures would be considered including slight overselling of permits <br /> with respect to the number of spaces and the repurchase of permits <br /> from people who were not using them. JT wanted to see more of a permit <br /> review. <br /> There was then some discussion of the response of the merchants to the <br /> program. RS read a letter from the 1776 Bottle Shop which said that <br /> business in January of this year was about 5% above last January and <br /> that February was about 12% below the same time last year and that the <br /> drop was attributed by the owner to the parking program. JT said that <br /> the condition of the economy could also explain the drop. <br /> WT. said that space was generally available except during the lunch <br /> hour and that Bel Canto was very pleased. <br /> Letters to the Committee <br /> Several letters were received from residents. One suggested moving the <br /> Post Office from the present site to the site of the former Rowe <br /> Chevrolet where NS bought his car and can no longer bring it for I <br /> service. Another letter suggested that parking meters for the library <br /> parking lot be considered. <br /> Signs <br /> LN said that the sign in the Meriam Street lot was not clear enough. <br /> The HDC sent a letter saying they were unhappy with the proliferation <br /> of signs. WT gave the opinion that the HDC has no control over <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.