Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> <br />Ms. Kosnoff shared that the Town’s 5-year capital plan are based off of estimates but <br />frequently changes based on changes in scope and price changes. Ms. Kosnoff shared that it <br />would be helpful to see placeholders for non-Town requests and noted that when the Town has <br />an anticipated project without a price yet, they use “TBD”. Ms. Kosnoff added that even an <br />estimated number conveys the expectancy for a request at some point down the line. <br /> <br />Ms. Walker commented that the numbers used for housing are not good estimates. Ms. Walker <br />commented that her primary concern is for affordable housing and how the public views the <br />need for affordable housing, and feels that the table’s numbers for housing create a false idea <br />of what is needed or will happen in Lexington over the next 4-5 years, as opposed to the other <br />categories. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Brien commented that the table also shows that the AHT’s request considers what the <br />CPC has available to allocate. Mr. Sandeen commented that if there were a Town staff member <br />dedicated to housing, there may be more accurate numbers for housing’s projections , and <br />commented his support for attempting to show the higher need for funding than what the CPC <br />has available. Mr. Creech commented that the housing partners are better off having some <br />level of projections for Annual Town Meeting, and supports the Looking Forward section’s <br />intention. <br /> <br />Mr. Pressman commented that the table does not include debt funding for the Munroe Center, <br />or potential debt funding for fields or the Stone Building. Ms. Kosnoff noted that FY25 is the last <br />year for authorized debt payments, but noted that there will be debt service for the Munroe <br />Center in future years, whenever the project begins. Mr. Kanter added that the encouragement <br />for the CPC to create a 5-year projection is to reflect the pressure faced by the CPC’s funding <br />constrains. <br /> <br />The Committee discussed minor changes to the language and formatting of the proposed <br />Looking Forward section. <br /> <br />After a motion duly made and seconded, the Committee voted by a roll call vote (7 -1-1) to <br />accept the Looking Forward section, as amended, into the 2023 Needs Assessment Report. Mr. <br />Pressman voted no and Ms. Walker abstained. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />After a motion duly made and seconded, the Committee voted by a roll call vote (9-0) to <br />adjourn at 6:23 PM. <br /> <br />The following documents were used at the meeting: <br />1) LexHAB 241 Grove St Exterior Paint Photos