2024-02-01-HPB-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

The neighbors’ objections were not a surprise, though Ms. Prosnitz did note that there was a lot of emotion in the meeting. The AHT is preparing an FAQ to address the concerns and to show that the AHT is taking note of them. Ms. Prosnitz asked for the HPB’s support at the many upcoming meetings about the Lowell Street projects. The members of the HPB then asked questions of Ms. Prosnitz. 4. Warrant Article 33: Authorize AHT to seek Affordable Housing Ms. Prosnitz asked for a letter of support regarding Article 33. Ms. Manz asked for the HPB’s sense as to whether the Board should support the article with a letter. Ms. Hai clarified that Article 33 both designates the land for affordable housing and authorizes the Select Board to provide the land to the AHT. Mr. Pressman added that the article also says that an RFP will be issued. Ms. Cohen moved that Ms. Manz or her designee write a letter of support of article 33. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the HPB voted by roll call of 8-0-0 to approve the motion. 5. Report on outreach to Michelle Ciccolo on receipt of Lexington SB RETF letter Ms. Heitz reported that Ms. Ciccolo submitted the Select Board’s letter of support for the RETF to the legislative hearing regarding the RETF. 6. Report on Fair Housing Webinar This discussion was deferred to a later meeting. 7. Report on SB receipt of Housing Feasibility Study on Town-Owned Land, brief summary of content, discussion of next steps Ms. Byrnes reported on the presentation by LDA Architects of the study of 3 town-owned properties: the Depot parking lot in Central Lexington, the parking lot across from the bike trail from the depot parking lot behind the CVS, and all or a portion of 171 to 173 Bedford Street, currently being used as a temporary police station. The report makes the case that there is demand but not supply for affordable housing. LDA views this as a marketing failure. The Town set the parameters for the LDA Architects study. These included but were not limited to optimizing for number of units and also for assessing a given mix of one, two, and three- bedroom units. LDA concluded that, for a variety of reasons, mixed income housing is not economically feasible on the lots in the center of Town. Mixed income housing is feasible on 171 to 173 Bedford Street, but that property may be required for other uses, for example, using the property for swing space for Town school offices. Ms. Hai added that the Select Board pushed back on the feasibility for commercial development. The SB also pushed back on the presumption that $6M be spent on making 173 Bedford Street