|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2024-02-26 SB Packet - Released
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Select Board-SB (formerly Selectmen, Board of-BOS)
>
Agenda Packets
>
2024
>
2024-02-26 SB Packet - Released
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2024 12:40:37 PM
Creation date
2/27/2024 12:43:35 PM
Metadata
Tags
_OCRd
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
535
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. Desired sidewalk to remain on bike ped priority list as is which is number 18 out of 91 <br /> sidewalk proj ects <br /> 2. Add white fog lines to road after neighborhood consensus <br /> 3. Move truck exclusion signs for better warning - in progress <br /> 4. Petition state (and Waltham) to exclude trucks from Walnut <br /> They further reviewed commonly used speed mitigation measures: Vertical deflection such as <br /> speed humps and speed tables and horizontal deflection such as a bump-outs. There was <br /> consensus that speed humps and bumps do slow speeds if place properly. There was also <br /> consensus that the road is already quite narrow and horizontal deflection would pose other dangers <br /> because there is little room for safe sideways deflection. <br /> Physical alterations to the roads are what will slow speeds. The speed humps make drivers <br /> uncomfortable and reduces speed. This is already a narrow road so narrowing the road is not a <br /> viable option. The Fire Department— due to response time, risk to patients, and damage to <br /> equipment is opposed to any kind of vertical deflection anywhere in town. This leaves TSG with <br /> few tools to slow drivers. <br /> What we did not discussed was balancing the risk as in slowing speeds using physical alterations <br /> on dangerous roads vs slowing response time and conflicting priorities in the community. <br /> Balancing the risk as well as balancing the Town's enforcement will need to be guided by policy. <br /> We have striped the road With a double yellow line and installed speed feedback signs (which did <br /> slow the traffic for a period of time). In addition to slower traffic, the Walnut neighborhood is <br /> seeking a sidewalk because speeds are too high to safely walk on the road. The new sidewalk is <br /> listed as #19 in the bicycle and pedestrian plan. Relatively high on the list— 18 out of 91 but it <br /> will be many years before that sidewalk would be built. TSG recommends that the sidewalk <br /> proj ect remain on the list at that rating. <br /> TSG also proposes painting white fog lines on the roadway to make the lanes feel narrow to help <br /> reduce speeds. Engineering has requested TSG meet with the neighborhood to seek buy-in before <br /> DPW paints the lines as they will be difficult to remove. TSG plans to hold that meeting in April, <br /> after the truck exclusion signs are moved. <br /> TSG has also requested the DPW to move the truck exclusion signs so the truck drivers are <br /> warned earlier and can turn on Pleasant Street ahead of the truck exclusion instead of using <br /> Walnut. <br /> And lastly, TSG will work to petition the state for a truck restriction on Walnut. <br /> Befo�e the meeting in Ap�il, TSG would app�eciate i�put f�om the Select Boa�d ahead of the <br /> neighbo�hood meeting. <br /> • Attached please find the agenda tracker for upcoming Select Board meetings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.