Laserfiche WebLink
12 <br />labor. Opinions may naturally differ as to the propriety of cer- <br />tain measures and rules. But, so long as those teachers are em- <br />ployed, it is the duty of all to uphold them, until removed. <br />Parents are pledged to their support. This we lay down as a <br />principle from which there can be no release, without unfaith- <br />fulness to the interests of education. According to our demo- <br />cratic forms of government, there is a constitutional remedy for <br />all abuse, or wrong,—an appeal to the committee, or removal of <br />the teacher; but, until one or the other of these things is done, <br />the teacher is absolute master, during the school term, of every <br />scholar; and the arm of the district is rightfully at his com- <br />mand, to maintain the order and regulations of the school. <br />Any other principle than this must introduce confusion into the <br />whole school -system. If every parent that is displeased with <br />any regulations of the school, asks to have them set aside in fa- <br />vor of his child, there is an end of school -government. We see <br />no escape from this argument, but in closing the schools. How <br />is it possible for parents to judge as well as the teacher? Do <br />they not place him or her in charge of the school, because they <br />think that they understand how the work should be done? If, <br />upon trial, they believe the teacher does not understand the <br />work, it is a duty to remove him; but, so long as he is there, <br />his law should receive the hearty, unanimous concurrence of <br />all. Take only a single illustration. Suppose, for instance, <br />that you belong to a company, or corporation. For purposes of <br />convenience, the business is committed to the charge of a suit- <br />able person, selected as your agent. By this means, all the en- <br />ergies and capacities of one man are devoted to the work, and <br />it is more sure of being well performed, than it could otherwise <br />be. All your powers, all your means, so far as the object in <br />view is concerned, are vested in him. He is your representa- <br />tive, acts in your name, studies your interests. Now, suppose <br />any one of your number, disapproving of his acts, should take <br />measures to interfere with him, and to impede him in his course. <br />Suppose that a number should do so. What would become of <br />your company? what of your interests? To say nothing of <br />rendering yourselves liable at law—could any enterprise be suc- <br />cessfully carried on in this manner ? It is precisely the same <br />• <br />Y <br />1 Mt <br />13 <br />with the teacher. He is your agent in the sacred cause of ed- <br />ucation. By making him such, you give him your authority, <br />and pledge to him your support. You declare that he is qual- <br />ified for the duty; and you cannot, without wronging him, and <br />interfering with your own highest interests, negative or oppose <br />his measures. In case of dissatisfaction, there is a legal remedy. <br />To that you are positively confined. If you can convince the <br />committee that he is unfit for his office, he may be removed ; <br />but, we repeat, so long as he is the teacher, he is absolute in his <br />school. No one has any authority but the committee. <br />We feel confident in these views, and will here say, that we <br />believe them to be entertained by the great majority of our peo- <br />ple. But some are not disposed to admit them. We ask all <br />such persons candidly to review the subject, and cannot doubt <br />they will accede to the justice of these sentiments. We urge <br />them as the law of the State, as the rightful demand of the <br />teacher, as the duty of parents. We ask, that no more com- <br />plaints may be acted out except in the legal manner, and that <br />all will join in upholding the government, order, and so the <br />prosperity, of our schools. <br />STUDIES IN SCHOOL. <br />We feel scarcely less interest in another subject, bearing most <br />intimately upon the welfare of our school -system; namely, the <br />multiplicity of the studies that are engaged in. The law pre- <br />scribes the elementary branches for our common schools, as <br />most important of all. It is their wise design, that they may <br />afford a course of education, adequate to the common and in- <br />dispensable wants of the community. Orthography, reading, <br />writing, English grammar, geography, and arithmetic, may be <br />said to comprise the demands, the immediate wants, of our <br />youth. If accurately and thoroughly pursued, they will fur- <br />nish them for the most obvious and pressing duties of life. <br />But these are by no means all the studies pursued among us. <br />Besides these, we have algebra, history, physiology, natural <br />philosophy, mental philosophy, astronomy, the higher branches <br />of mathematics, geometry, book-keeping, composition, drawing, <br />Latin, and French. A common -school education demands six <br />branches, but we have twenty. That is, we have converted <br />