'9
<br />relief is necessary, which might be secured if this building alone was
<br />to be considered, by adding an extension to the present structure, or
<br />by erecting an entirely separate building. 'i'he Adams school is not
<br />crowded at present, but its attendance is increasing, and at no very
<br />distant day will demand attention. Considering the present condi-
<br />tions and demands, there seems to your committee three courses for
<br />the town to choose between; First, to erect a new building to be
<br />be occupied exclusively by the High school, and reopen some of the
<br />old district schools to relieve the Hancock school; second, to erect
<br />a new building exclusively for the High school and either enlarge the
<br />Hancock school or build an entirely separate building to relieve it,
<br />or, third, to build a new building sufficiently large to accommodate
<br />the High school and some of the grades from the Hancock school,
<br />and later, when necessary, from the Adams school. After carefully
<br />considering these various plans, your committee disapprove of the
<br />first, because it believes that the reopening of the district schools
<br />would be a step backward towards the system discarded 10 years
<br />ago. We disapprove of the second plan as needlessly expensive at
<br />the present time, although, otherwise, the most desirable. We
<br />approve of the third plan, as under all the present circumstances
<br />meeting the urgent needs with the least expense and in no way
<br />interfering with that part of the second plan, suggesting the enlarge-
<br />ment of the Hancock school, or the erection of a separate primary
<br />building when the further growth of the town demands it. We
<br />therefore, recommend that the town immediately provide for the
<br />erection of a new school building on the site of the present High
<br />school building, or on some more desirable one, if such can be found,
<br />said building to comprise not less than eight (8) rooms, to accom-
<br />modate the High school and such grades from the Hancock school
<br />and Adams school as the School Committee may determine, and as
<br />the cost of brick construction is only about one-third more than that
<br />of wood, while its depreciation is, of course, scarcely anything as com-
<br />pared with wood, we recommend that the building be erected of
<br />brick. We urge that its construction be begun as early as possible,
<br />in order to relieve the present congested condition above referred to
<br />without further unnecessary detriment to the school system of the
<br />20
<br />town. Upon inquiry and investigation, your committee find that
<br />the cost of such a building would be from $5,000 to $6,000 per
<br />room according to the quality of material used, and we believe that
<br />the present is a most opportune time for providing for the cost, as
<br />the final payment on the Hancock sc000l is made in June of this
<br />year, and a similar arrangement could be made for the payment of
<br />the cost of the new building by spreading it over a period of years.
<br />In concluding it is appropriate to state that Mr. Edward P. Bliss,
<br />who is a member of our committee, has been unable to meet with
<br />us on account of his absence from town, but his well known attitude
<br />with reference to all that advances the interests of our schools is an
<br />ample assurance of his cordial indorsement of this report. Our
<br />committee wish also to express our sorrow for the sickness of Mr.
<br />Charles A. Wellington, the only other member whose signature is not
<br />appended. Mr. Wellington has taken a great interest in the investi-
<br />gations of the committee, and did his condition permit, he would
<br />heartily join in the recommendations herein made.
<br />Respectfully Submitted,
<br />EDWIN A. BAYLEY,
<br />MARY E. WOODWARD,
<br />EMMA W. DAVIS,
<br />IDA L. WILLARD,
<br />J. ODIN TILTON,
<br />HERBERT V. SM ITR,
<br />ABRAM C. WASHBURN,
<br />CHARLES H. WISWELL,
<br />JAMES P. MUNROE,
<br />PATRICK F. DACEY.
<br />And on his motion
<br />Voted, That the report be accepted.
<br />
|