Laserfiche WebLink
04/03/2017 AC Minutes <br />➢ By including a public benefit, such as some affordable housing; <br />➢ By building a Balanced Housing Development (BHD) with multiple units; as long as the <br />total gross floor area (GFA) of all units meets the GFA restrictions currently allowed, there <br />are no restrictions on the number of units that can be built on a lot or an assembled cluster <br />of lots; <br />➢ By creating a site -sensitive development that incorporates environmental considerations. <br />Article 40 proposes a sliding scale for BHD's that would reduce the allowed GFA on the site as the <br />number of units is increased but allow a "density bonus" to compensate. The result is that as building <br />mass decreases, the number of residents on the site can be expected to increase because there would be <br />more units. <br />Mr. Daggett presented a financial analysis of the proposed bylaw change taking into account the effect of <br />increasing density on both tax revenue and the demand on Town services, including the schools. The <br />analysis indicated that a BHD for a development containing up to 18 housing units on a lot that would <br />otherwise support 6 units "by right," might result in a net financial loss to the Town of up to $300,000 per <br />year depending on the additional number of units allowed. (Mr. Daggett subsequently acknowledged that <br />the analysis is flawed because it was based on a misinterpretation of data from the Enrollment Working <br />Group's 2014 report.) <br />Mr. Daggett noted that the Planning Board continues to develop details on the proposed bylaw changes in <br />Articles 40 and 42, including requirements for affordable housing and/or open space. It isn't clear <br />whether the proposed bylaws would impact property values in the area of a BHD or a two-family house. <br />He questioned whether it is advisable to move forward on these articles given the time constraints and the <br />current lack of clarity on the details of the proposals. <br />Members of this Committee generally agreed that there would not be time to analyze and prepare a <br />written report on these articles, particularly where the motions and the Planning Board reports are not yet <br />available. <br />3. Next Meetings <br />The next meeting is on April 5. This Committee will not meet on April 10 because of Passover. This <br />Committee has not yet taken a position on Article 44 Amend Zoning Bylaw Brookhaven (Owner <br />Article), which is expected to be brought to Town Meeting on April 12. <br />4. Adjourn <br />The Committee adjourned at 7:25 p.m. <br />The documents used at the meeting are listed below. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Sara Arnold, Recording Secretary <br />Approved: May 15, 2017 <br />Exhibits <br />• Agenda, posted by John Bartenstein, Chair <br />• Preliminary Draft for Discussion: Table identifying BHD financial impacts as identified <br />by Mr. Daggett <br />2 <br />