Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
Questions and comments from the audience: <br />Phyllis Scott, 85 Woburn Street, stated that she was concerned about her trees along the property <br />line. She was also concerned about increased flooding in that area. <br />Motion to approve the insignificant plan change made by Mr. Langseth and seconded by Mrs. <br />Dohan. Vote: 4-0 in favor. <br />7:03pm <br />Informal Meeting Request: Brookhaven Rezoning Article 44, Update on proposal and plans <br />William Dailey- attorney and Jim Burabach- project engineer <br />Mr. Dailey explained that they are scheduled to go before Town Meeting in a week and they <br />want to give the commission an update on some of the changes to the proposed Brookhaven <br />expansion. They want the commission to be comforatable with what they are proposing to town <br />meeting. <br />Mr. Burabach stated that that they are proposing to have an access road cross over the <br />intermittent stream. He explained that they will be spanning the existing culvert to attempt to <br />reduce disturbance in the area. They explained that the will be replicating this disturbance 2:1 <br />somewhere else on the site. The detention basin has also changed slightly in size since the last <br />time they came to the commission. <br />Mr. Dailey explained that they will also be going before the planning board for approval. The <br />planning board has requested that they change the look of the retaining wall along the front of <br />the property to be more aesthetically pleasing. However, that change would lead to more <br />disturbance in the wetland area. <br />Questions and comments from the commission: <br />The commission asked for clarification as to where the replication area will be. Mr. Burabach <br />explained that the replication will be done at the site of the disturbance. <br />The commission stated that they understood why they were trying to keep the existing culvert <br />crossing, but they would like the applicant to look into upgrading the crossing to current stream <br />crossing standards. <br />The commission stated that they are in favor of the retaining wall that would keep the wall as far <br />as possible from the wetlands. They will write a memo to the planning board expressing their <br />preference. <br />7:19pm <br />DEP 201-1053, BL 1010 <br /> <br />