Laserfiche WebLink
Although the current valuation of the Brookhaven facility is not available from the Assessors' <br /> Department, the Committee estimates that Brookhaven's existing PILOT represents roughly one- <br /> half to two-thirds of the residential property tax it would pay if it were deemed to be taxable. <br /> This is a very rough, back-of-the-envelope calculation based on taxes paid by Avalon at <br /> Lexington — and adjusting for the somewhat smaller size of Brookhaven. Once the expansion <br /> units are constructed, that ratio may be somewhat closer to one-half. <br /> The property tax status of Brookhaven is determined by the Town's Board of Assessors. At its <br /> September 12, 2016 meeting, the Board of Assessors determined that Brookhaven "has provided <br /> sufficient evidence to meet its burden of proof establishing entitlement to an exemption from the <br /> local property taxes pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 59 Section 5 Clause Third" as a "charitable <br /> organization" and voted 2-0 in favor of continuing the charitable tax exemption which <br /> Brookhaven has had since its inception. <br /> It should be noted that an organization's status as a non-profit corporation or a 501(c)(3) entity <br /> under the federal tax laws does not per se entitle that organization to exemption from local <br /> property taxes see Mass. Dept. of Revenue, Taxpayer's Guide to Local Property Tax <br /> Exemptions, Religious and Charitable Organizations (2016), p.3 ("Non-profit status is not <br /> sufficient, nor is tax exempt status for state or federal tax purposes. The organization must be <br /> organized for charitable purposes and must actually operate as a public charity. To qualify for <br /> exemption, an organization's dominant purposes and activities must benefit the public at large, <br /> not just a limited group of people"). Continuing care retirement facilities in other communities <br /> have been determined to be taxable, even though organized and operated as non-profits, and <br /> there is no assurance that Brookhaven will continue to be treated as tax-exempt in the future. <br /> The Board of Assessors is the only body within the Town authorized to determine the charitable <br /> status of a property owner, and Town Meeting is not empowered to change that determination. <br /> In the event the Board of Assessors determines in the future that Brookhaven is not entitled to a <br /> charitable exemption, and that determination is not successfully appealed, the MOA provides <br /> that the PILOT payment will be replaced by actual taxes based on the assessed valuation of the <br /> Brookhaven facility. Brookhaven will continue to be responsible for the affordable housing <br /> mitigation payment even if determined subject to taxation. <br /> As Brookhaven is a continuing care retirement community with a minimum age of 62 and an <br /> average age of 86, its expansion will have no direct impact on the Lexington Public Schools. <br /> Indeed, a study recently done by OHI Engineering found that there would be relatively little <br /> impact to any of Lexington's public services. However, as Brookhaven is satisfying the Town's <br /> request to help maintain the Town's affordable housing ratio by contributing to the Town's <br /> construction of 5.5 external affordable units, rather than providing affordable units within its <br /> own complex, the external units can be assumed to have the same impact as any other new <br /> residential construction. <br /> If Brookhaven does not go forward with this project and sells the property, a developer would be <br /> able to put to put four single family homes on the property by right. With special permitting, it is <br /> possible that a subdivision with a substantially larger number of units, perhaps as many as 10-14, <br /> could be approved for the site. A residential development would likely have a greater impact on <br /> Lexington schools and town services. The Town's negotiating committee took this issue into <br /> account during the negotiations and felt that a conventional residential subdivision alternative <br /> would be a less desirable outcome. <br /> 5 <br />