Laserfiche WebLink
2/15/2024 AC Minutes <br />4 <br />alternative to 173 Bedford St., but responses are not due until tomorrow, February 16. Mr. Cronin <br />from the DPF has stated that there will not be much difference in the operating expenses between <br />natural gas and electric heat-pump systems. <br />Regarding Articles 29, 34, 35, and 36, Mr. Michelson stated that he had contacted the Police admin- <br />istration and the DPW staff to discuss the potential need for additional staffing to enforce the pro- <br />posed changes and additions to the Town bylaws. His conclusion is that additions to staffing that are <br />already in the budget will be sufficient to handle any new enforcement needs introduced through <br />these articles. The Committee decided not to formally vote on these articles, but to include its com- <br />mentary in the 2024 ATM report. <br />The Committee engaged in a discussion on Article 33 Authorize the Select Board to Seek Affordable <br />Housing. The primary concern, as expressed by Mr. Bartenstein, is that the motion provides too few <br />constraints on the development that could be built if the Select Board is authorized to dispose of <br />parcel 68-44, and that town meeting should be able to see a more definitive proposal before granting <br />the request. The request to give authorization to the Select Board lacks transparency in that it does <br />not describe with any specificity what might be done if the authorization is granted. This Committee <br />should understand the impact on a development on town finances, e.g., from new children in the <br />schools or demand for police, fire, and social services, and whether there would be any revenue <br />from payments in lieu of taxes by the owners of a prospective development. Mr. Parker raised sev- <br />eral points from previous discussions that suggest that changes to the process like those that Mr. <br />Bartenstein favors would make the proposal process infeasible. Mr. Michelson asserted that town <br />meeting would be unlikely to approve the motion in its current form. His recommendation would be <br />for the Affordable Housing Trust to present a more specific development proposal to town meeting. <br />He agreed that this Committee does not have sufficient information to be able to comment on the <br />financial implications of the article. Mr. Parker commented that his understanding from Select <br />Board Member Mark Sandeen was that an all-affordable development would not be financially via- <br />ble with fewer than 35 units, and that 40 units would be preferable for developers. Mr. Levine ex- <br />pressed frustration that this minimum had not been part of Ms. Tung’s presentation to the Commit- <br />tee, and he stated that he would not want to see that many units in the development. <br />Mr. Bartenstein asked if there was any way for town meeting to claw back funds once they have <br />been appropriated to the Affordable Housing Trust. Ms. Kosnoff replied that it would not be possi- <br />ble. <br />Mr. Parker decided to defer the Committee’s vote on whether to recommend Article 33, while not- <br />ing that the Committee was almost unanimously opposed to it. <br />All the previously collected votes of the Committee were affirmed by a single roll-call vote of 7-0. <br />Minutes of Prior Meetings <br />No minutes were ready for approval. <br />Adjourn <br />The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Glenn P. Parker