|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2007-11-14 Ad hoc Budget Schedule Report
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Ad hoc Budget Schedule Committee, Ad hoc-BSAH
>
Reports
>
2007-11-14 Ad hoc Budget Schedule Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2022 3:47:27 PM
Creation date
3/6/2017 5:07:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2007
Author or Source
Ad-Hoc Budget Schedule Committee
Keywords or Subject
Ad-Hoc Budget Schedule Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY FINDINGS <br />The committee studied and discussed several alternatives: <br />1. Hold town elections in November, allowing Town Meeting to convene much earlier. <br />This attracted interest but is contravened by state law, which requires our annual town <br />elections to be held in February -May. (i1{GL Ch. 39, 9A) A change of election date <br />would also require a change of town bylaws. <br />2. Schedule override elections on the first Monday in Match, on the same day as town <br />elections —that is, before Town Meeting convenes. <br />3 . Collapse the schedules for both the budget and Town Meeting as much as possible, to <br />make an override election as early as possible. The result is called an "optimal schedule" <br />in this report. <br />The committee recommends the third course of action --- option 3 —and it will be discussed in <br />more detail later in this report. <br />Option 2 was researched and discussed. There are towns that conduct overrides before their <br />annual town meetings actually vote on the budget. However, there are few doing so that also have <br />representative town meetings. In Lexington's political culture, the committee believes this option <br />would require the budget to be completed extremely early (including approval by the elected boards), <br />because voters and campaigners would expect the usual level of budget detail in the Yes and No <br />override campaigns. A budget might have to be completed in December if it were to be the subject <br />of a March 1 override, and yct,, for reasons explained later, budgets are not likely to be fully approved <br />before February. There was also a consensus in the committee that members of our representative <br />town meeting would feel disenfranchised by an override campaign and election that prejudged the <br />budget to be presented to the annual Town Meeting. <br />Option 3 would allow overrides to be scheduled as early as the second half of April, if the <br />department heads and their governing boards, seeing the necessity of an override, were to make an <br />early override a very high priority. The Superintendent comments' that a mid -April override would <br />be enormously advantageous compared with our current situation, in which a great deal of hiring is <br />delayed until the summer. <br />4 Private communication between Superintendent P. Ash and "1". Diaz, Q4 2007. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.