Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY FINDINGS <br />The committee studied and discussed several alternatives: <br />1. Hold town elections in November, allowing Town Meeting to convene much earlier. <br />This attracted interest but is contravened by state law, which requires our annual town <br />elections to be held in February -May. (i1{GL Ch. 39, 9A) A change of election date <br />would also require a change of town bylaws. <br />2. Schedule override elections on the first Monday in Match, on the same day as town <br />elections —that is, before Town Meeting convenes. <br />3 . Collapse the schedules for both the budget and Town Meeting as much as possible, to <br />make an override election as early as possible. The result is called an "optimal schedule" <br />in this report. <br />The committee recommends the third course of action --- option 3 —and it will be discussed in <br />more detail later in this report. <br />Option 2 was researched and discussed. There are towns that conduct overrides before their <br />annual town meetings actually vote on the budget. However, there are few doing so that also have <br />representative town meetings. In Lexington's political culture, the committee believes this option <br />would require the budget to be completed extremely early (including approval by the elected boards), <br />because voters and campaigners would expect the usual level of budget detail in the Yes and No <br />override campaigns. A budget might have to be completed in December if it were to be the subject <br />of a March 1 override, and yct,, for reasons explained later, budgets are not likely to be fully approved <br />before February. There was also a consensus in the committee that members of our representative <br />town meeting would feel disenfranchised by an override campaign and election that prejudged the <br />budget to be presented to the annual Town Meeting. <br />Option 3 would allow overrides to be scheduled as early as the second half of April, if the <br />department heads and their governing boards, seeing the necessity of an override, were to make an <br />early override a very high priority. The Superintendent comments' that a mid -April override would <br />be enormously advantageous compared with our current situation, in which a great deal of hiring is <br />delayed until the summer. <br />4 Private communication between Superintendent P. Ash and "1". Diaz, Q4 2007. <br />4 <br />