2016-12-15-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

consideration at the upcoming Annual Town Meeting but they will not have an updated plan with pricing for at least another month. The CPC questioned the need for the sidewalk, citing the absence of a crosswalk near the property on Marrett Road and the lack of people who actually walk to the Community Center. There was also discussion about the potential design, including the proposed materials and length of the sidewalk. After a motion duly made and seconded, the CPC voted, 6-3, to include the project on the warrant as a placeholder, pending additional information about final design and costs. 3)Center Streetscape Improvements- Mr. Pinsonneault and Mr. Livsey also discussed the potential request for partial CPA funding for the Center Streetscape project. Mr. Pinsonneault again explained that there was no exact cost associated with the request but outlined the different tiers of the project and provided the dates of upcoming hearings and meetings that would help determine the direction and scope of the project. Ultimately, the project is pending direction from the Board of Selectmen. The potential aspects of the project that could be funded by the CPA are sidewalk material, landscape elements, historical elements and pedestrian lighting. Mr. Hornig opined that the Committee should be provided with a more specific list of the aspects that could be funded by the CPA instead of just generalities. Mr. Pinsonneault did not disagree but explained that much of the project is pending direction from the Board of Selectmen. Mr. Wolk mentioned that supporting the project at this stage may be premature due to the many unknown aspects and questioned if the project could wait until the next fiscal year. Mr. Horton believed that the project would be brought to the be best for the Committee to have a stake in the decision. After a motion duly made and seconded, the CPC voted, 6-3, to include the project on the warrant as a placeholder, pending additional information about final design and costs. 4)Final Votes on FY18 CPA Projects- The CPC issued final votes on all FY18 CPA projects. Discussion is noted where relevant. a)Interpretive Signage Project ($38,400) Vote (9-0) Discussion previously noted. b) Vote (8-0-1) No further discussion. c)Greeley Village Rear Door and Porch Preservation Supplemental Request ($56,712) Vote (9-0) No further discussion. 2