Laserfiche WebLink
Protection. The break -down of the request includes $10,000 for remediation and $60,000 to <br />complete and file a conservation restriction. <br />The CPC was in agreement that the cost for the conservation restriction seemed excessively <br />high, citing a previous FY14 funding request that appropriated $25,000 for five separate <br />restrictions. The Committee thought that a further break -down of all associated costs would be <br />beneficial in addition to a report on how past CPA funds allocated to Wright Farm had been <br />used. Ms. Kowalski agreed that it was important to provide information to illustrate the overall <br />picture. The Committee expressed a general willingness to support the project but did not issue <br />a straw vote. Ms. Kowalski agreed to re -work the proposal and provide additional information <br />in order for the CPC to issue a more justified position. <br />4) Member Concerns- While Ms. Kowalski was still present at the meeting, Mr. Pressman asked <br />her about the possibility of the Planning Department applying for CPA funds to support the <br />design of community housing on the Leary property. Further discussion ensued about trying to <br />move along the design of previously acquired community housing properties while recognizing <br />the burden on LexHAB. The CPC agreed that a design proposal would be suitable for review in <br />the next fiscal year funding cycle. <br />After a motion duly made and seconded, the meeting was adjourned at 5:15 PM. <br />The following documents were submitted /utilized at the meeting: <br />1) FY18 CIP Application- Wright Farm Additional Site Assessment <br />2) FY18 CIP Application- Stone Building Analysis <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Elizabeth Mancini <br />Administrative Assistant <br />Community Preservation Committee <br />2 <br />