2016-11-03-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

potential request may be for appraisal and assessment costs but the project has not progressed past placeholder status. Ms. Simmons, Mr. Coleman and Mr. Filadoro left the meeting at the conclusion of the discussion. 5) Approval of Minutes- After a motion duly made and seconded, the CPC voted to approve the minutes, as submitted, from their meeting on September 6, 2016. The vote was 6 -0 -1. Mr. Pressman offered an amendment to a section of the minutes from the CPC meeting on October 27, 2016. After brief discussion and a motion duly made and seconded, the minutes were approved as amended, 7 -0. 6) Member Concerns- The Committee discussed the issue of working with limited funds and how best to consider multiple funding requests. Ms. Shaw noted that it's the Committee's job to weigh tough choices. Ms. Fenollosa also reminded the Committee members that it's their obligation to analyze each project fully, fairly and within budget. After a motion duly made and seconded, the meeting was adjourned at 5:15 PM. The following documents were submitted/ utilized at the meeting: 1) Draft CPC meeting minutes- 9.6.16 2) Draft CPC meeting minutes- 10.27.16 3) FY18 Recreation CIP applications 4) Suggested changes- 10.27.16 minutes submitted by Bob Pressman 3