Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of December 11, 1989 2 <br /> discretionary. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mr. Williams, <br /> it was voted 5-0 to recommend the special permit to allow illumination <br /> of the "Mobil Mart" sign, advertising the location of the convenience <br /> store within the gasoline station, be denied. <br /> On the motion of Mr. Williams, seconded by Mrs. Wood, it was voted 4-1-0 <br /> (Mr. Sorensen voted in the negative) , to recommend that the size of the <br /> Pegasus sign be limited to no more than three feet in diameter, as <br /> permitted under the Zoning By-Law. <br /> 21 Worthen Road, Roth & Strong, Inc. , SP, to install a free standing <br /> externally illuminated sign indicating the name of the tenant occupying <br /> the building: The Board agreed that there could be confusion in <br /> locating the tenant at 21 Worthen Road because of the location of the <br /> Militia Drive complex next door on one side and the Goodwill truck on <br /> the other side of the building. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded <br /> by Mr. Williams, it was voted 5-0 to recommend the special permit be <br /> granted with the condition that this be the only sign allowed, and that <br /> the sign may be no larger than 3 ft. by 5 ft. even if there are more <br /> tenants in the future. <br /> DETERMINATION OF GRADE AND CONSTRUCTION OF UNACCEPTED STREETS <br /> 294. CUS 89-4. Valley Road. Lot 18-A. Maria Massucco: The Board discussed a <br /> memo from Assistant Planner Nordby dated December 7, 1989, containing a draft <br /> motion based on the Engineering Department's recommendation on what should be <br /> required to bring Valley Road up to adequate grade and construction insofar as <br /> would be required to provide frontage for lot 18A. They noted the previous <br /> determination (CUS 87-3 for Mr. and Mrs. Andrew Massucco to provide frontage <br /> for Lot 29 on Town property map #79) , required that the unpaved portion of the <br /> road be regraded and that 1" to 3" of crusher run material be applied, and <br /> that these improvements had not even held up for two years. <br /> On the motion of Mr. Williams, seconded by Mr. Sorensen, it was voted 4-1-0 <br /> (Mrs. Klauminzer voted in the negative) : <br /> to determine that in the opinion of the Planning Board, Valley Road, <br /> insofar as it provides frontage for Lot 18A as shown on Map 79, is not <br /> now of adequate grade and construction. If the improvements, as <br /> specified below, are made, and are considered adequate upon inspection <br /> by the Town Engineer, then the part of Valley Road to which the Planning <br /> Board required improvements would be of adequate grade and construction. <br /> 1. The improvements shall be made from the end of the existing <br /> pavement, for a length of 300 feet at a width to match the <br /> existing pavement. The work is to be done to Town standard. <br /> 2. Prior to the initiation of any work, a plan, which has been <br /> prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for <br /> approval. <br />