|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
Planning Board minutes 1989-10-02
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Planning Board minutes 1989-10-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2024 3:44:12 PM
Creation date
1/30/2024 3:44:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
1989
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
Planning Board minutes 1989-10-02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes for the Meeting of October 2, 1989 2 <br /> SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br /> 240. Carriage Drive. Woodhaven Realty: Mrs. Nordby reported the applicant <br /> has asked permission to provide surety for completion of the subdivision by a <br /> letter of credit instead of a passbook. Mr. Sorensen said he preferred that <br /> surety be held in the form of a passbook, but he understood that the statute <br /> specifically authorized letters of credit as a means to hold surety. On the <br /> motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Klauminzer it was voted 4-0: <br /> That the Planning Board accepts as surety, for the completion of the Car- <br /> riage Drive subdivision, a Letter of Credit from the Depositors Trust <br /> Company dated August 22, 1989 in the amount of $62,000. This Letter of <br /> Credit is accepted in place of Depositors Trust Company Passbook #402- <br /> 4354. <br /> That acceptance of this substitute form of surety does not change either <br /> the amount of surety, $62,000, which is needed, or the period of time, <br /> through August 1, 1990, for which the surety is provided, as determined by <br /> vote of the Planning Board on July 31, 1989. The amount of $62,000 has <br /> been determined to be sufficient through August 1, 1990 only. If the <br /> subdivision is not completed by that time, the amount of surety needed <br /> will have to be reevaluated to determine its relationship between the then <br /> applicable construction costs and the work remaining to be completed. If <br /> little or none of the work that remained, at the time $62,000 of surety <br /> was originally posted, is completed by August 1, 1990, and the current <br /> costs of the amount of work to be completed has increased, the amount of <br /> surety will be increased to reflect the costs of completing the work and <br /> the developer will be required to furnish additional surety to the <br /> Planning Board. <br /> That the Revenue Officer is authorized to release to R & T Development <br /> Corporation Depositors Trust Company Passbook #402-4354 and the signed <br /> withdrawal slip upon receipt of the August 22, 1989 Letter of Credit. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS ON APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> 241. Applications for the Meeting of October 26. 1989: Mrs. Klauminzer gave <br /> an oral review of the following applications to the Board of Appeals: <br /> 16 King Street, Marilyn Ritholz, SP, to use a portion of a residence as an <br /> office to see private clients one day a week. The Board expressed concern <br /> over potential traffic problems because of the property's proximity to <br /> Wilson Farm. On the motion of Mrs. Klauminzer, seconded by Mrs. Uhrig, it <br /> was voted 3-1 (Mr. Sorensen voted in the negative) to not object to the <br /> granting of the special permit, provided the day the applicant sees <br /> clients remains Tuesday, which is the day Wilson Farm is closed, and a <br /> condition for approval is that there may be no on-street parking. <br /> The Board also agreed to make no comment on the following applications also <br /> scheduled to be heard on October 26, 1989. <br /> 675 Lowell Street, Burlington Village Associates, SP, to install 5 <br /> internally lit wall signs and to allow a secondary wall sign to be the <br /> same width as the principal wall sign at a new retail building in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.