Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 <br /> The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G-15, Town Office <br /> Building, was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Wood, with <br /> members Klauminzer, Williams, Planning Director Bowyer, Secretary Peters, <br /> Planning Aide Kotval and Zoning Officer Marino present. Mrs. Uhrig and Mr. <br /> Sorensen arrived during Item 232. <br /> ****************** FALL SPECIAL TOWN MEETING ****************************** <br /> 232. Planning Board Annual Housing Report and Report on Affordable Housing: <br /> The Board reviewed a final draft, dated September 25, 1989. On the motion of <br /> Mrs. Klauminzer, seconded by Mrs. Uhrig, it was voted 5-0 to approve the <br /> report, as written. <br /> *********** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ***************** <br /> SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br /> 233. Royal Circle. Barry Caouette. Definitive Plan: The Board reviewed and <br /> corrected a draft Certificate of Action, dated September 27, 1989, approving <br /> the definitive plan. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Klaumin- <br /> zer, it was voted 5-0 to approve the definitive plan, and the Certificate of <br /> Action, as amended. The Board will act on the Special Permit with Site Plan <br /> Review for the subdivision at its October 16, 1989 meeting. <br /> 234. PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING. 170 Wood Street. Preliminary Plan: Mrs. <br /> Wood opened the informational meeting at 7:15 p.m. by asking that the persons <br /> presenting the plan introduce themselves. Mr. Robert L. Higgins, representing <br /> CLV Realty Trust, introduced the applicant, Joanne Vilasi, and Landscape <br /> Architect Gary Larson, of Larson Associates. <br /> Mr. Higgins referred to a letter dated March 9, 1988 from the Planning <br /> Director which discussed two points raised by the Board: <br /> 1) that endorsement of a Form A by the Board, that divided the original <br /> site into two lots, one containing three illegally built apartments, in <br /> no way legalized their existence; that all the endorsed Form A did was <br /> state the two lots had legal frontage on an accepted way, and sufficient <br /> lot area to conform to the requirements of the zoning district; and that <br /> the problem of the illegal apartments must be resolved before any sub- <br /> division can proceed, since the provisions of Section 6.2.5 of the <br /> Zoning By-Law require that "if land is subdivided, . . . no building or <br /> other permit shall be issued . . . until both the lot retained and the <br /> newly created lot(s) meet the requirements of this By-Law". <br /> 2) An applicant for approval of a cluster subdivision is not entitled to <br /> the maximum density which results from the calculations described in <br /> subsection 9.2.9 of the Zoning By-Law; rather, the number of dwelling <br /> units that may be included in cluster subdivision is the number the <br /> Planning Board approves after application of the criteria set forth in <br /> Iy <br />