|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
Planning Board minutes 1989-09-18
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Planning Board minutes 1989-09-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2024 3:38:59 PM
Creation date
1/30/2024 3:38:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
1989
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
Planning Board minutes 1989-09-18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes for the Meeting of September 18, 1989 2 <br /> might consider incorporating some sort of natural pathway instead of a <br /> standard sidewalk; and they recommended that, as the next step, the applicant <br /> file one preliminary plan incorporating these recommendations. Mr. Sorensen <br /> suggested that Mr. Norton recheck some of the calculations shown on the plan, <br /> and that he obtain a letter from Boston Edison stating that their interest in <br /> the existing right-of-way over the property has been abandoned. <br /> Later in the evening, the Board gave direction to the staff for preparation of <br /> the decision. They agreed that none of the plans were acceptable and recom- <br /> mended the applicant file another preliminary plan. They also agreed that a <br /> refined Scheme A, with a 24 foot wide roadway that will remain private and end <br /> in a hammerhead, has the most potential to be an acceptable plan. A landscape <br /> plan showing existing trees on the site is required; a walkway that does not <br /> follow the road would be considered; and no more than four dwelling units can <br /> be allowed, as demonstrated by the proof plan. <br /> 227. Subdivision Streets for Acceptance: The Board reviewed a draft memo <br /> from the Planning Board to the Board of Selectmen, dated September 18, 1989, <br /> listing several completed subdivision streets that could be proposed for <br /> acceptance at the 1990 Annual Town Meeting. <br /> The Board granted the president of the Pheasant Brook Neighborhood Associa- <br /> tion, Joseph Dini, permission to ask what could be done about cleaning up some <br /> conservation areas that abut private property in the subdivision, and what <br /> process is followed to bring the streets before Town Meeting for acceptance. <br /> Mr. Bowyer noted that the landscaping meets Town requirements, which are not <br /> very rigorous, and not what the Board would like to see. Ms. Nordby reported <br /> that the work shown on the as-built plans, as remaining to be completed is <br /> proceeding well. <br /> On the motion of Mr. Williams, seconded by Mr. Sorensen, it was voted unani- <br /> mously to recommend to the Selectmen that the following streets be proposed to <br /> the 1990 Town Meeting for acceptance by the Town: <br /> Philbrook Terrace <br /> Solomon Pierce Road <br /> Joseph Comee Road <br /> Lothrup Circle <br /> Butterfield Road, from the end of Solomon Pierce Rd. to Joseph Comee Rd. <br /> East Emerson Road <br /> Jonas Stone Circle <br /> Tidd Circle and <br /> North Emerson Road (from Diamond Street to the end of the cul-de-sac). <br /> 228. Carchia Woods. release of Lot 5: On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, <br /> seconded by Mr. Williams, it was voted unanimously to release Lot 5. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS ON APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> 229. 57 Bedford Street. Lumberyard Office Building: The Board reviewed and <br /> approved a letter to Attorney James Whalen of Palmer & Dodge thanking him for <br /> his "prompt response and creative solution to the unique issues posed by the <br /> Lumberyard Office Building zoning situation". The letter responded to some <br /> language in Mr. Whalen's opinion to clarify that the building is vested under <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.