Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of July 31, 1989 5 <br /> 2) that this amount is based on construction costs at the time of the <br /> original surety deposit on March 10, 1989 is determined to be sufficient <br /> through March 13, 1990 only. If the subdivision is not completed by <br /> that time, the amount of surety needed will have to be reevaluated to <br /> determine its relationship between the then applicable construction <br /> costs and the work remaining to be completed. If little or none of the <br /> work that remained, at the time this surety was reduced, is completed by <br /> March 13, 1990, and the current costs of the amount of work to be <br /> completed has increased, the amount of surety will be increased to <br /> reflect the costs of completing the work and the developer will be <br /> required to furnish additional surety to the Planning Board. <br /> 3) that the Planning Board votes to reduce the amount of surety to <br /> $22,405, which is 15% of the total "Cost to Construct ($158,069)," as <br /> the amount necessary to hold until the completion of the community <br /> facilities and the subdivision. <br /> ********************* ARTICLES FOR 1990 TOWN MEETING *********************** <br /> 196. Zoning Amendment Filed by 10 or More Registered Voters: The Board <br /> discussed a proposed amendment filed by Ephraim Weiss, and 10 registered <br /> voters, on July 19, 1989, that would amend the definition of "Accessory Build- <br /> ing", and further restrict the construction, installation or use of any tank <br /> or vessel for the storage of a chemical or fuel, as specified in Line 18.4 of <br /> Table II in Section 4 of the Zoning By-Law. <br /> *****************fie******** REPORTS **********************************, ******* <br /> 197. Assistant Planner <br /> a. Pheasant Brook II, Setting of Fees for New Submission: Ms. Nordby <br /> reported that there has been some confusion about what the fees should <br /> be on the new filing. Mr. Sorensen and Mr. Williams believed this was <br /> not a new submission, warranting the smaller fee, and Mrs. Klauminzer <br /> and Mrs. Uhrig believed it was a new submission warranting the larger <br /> fees. The Board did not agree on what portion of Section 8 of the <br /> Development Regulations, dealing with what fees, applies to the defini- <br /> tive plan filed on Pheasant Brook II, and they agreed to postpone any <br /> decision until a full Board can act. <br /> 198. Planning Board, Subcommittees <br /> a. National Park Service Plan: Mrs. Uhrig reported on a memo, dated <br /> July 6, 1989, from Frederick A. Szarka, Superintendent of the Minute Man <br /> National Historical Park, reporting on a "Record of Decision, Finding of <br /> No Significant Impact, Minute Man National Historical Park General <br /> Management Plan", which documents official National Park Service <br /> decisions. She expressed disappointment that the traffic problems on <br /> Battle Road were not addressed except in a most general way. <br /> The meeting was adjourned at 9: 55 p.m. <br /> (1)17X2'I6 <br /> David G. Williams, Clerk <br />