Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the meeting of July 10, 1989 3 <br /> the current costs of the amount of work to be completed has increased, <br /> the amount of surety will be increased to reflect the costs of complet- <br /> ing the work and the developer will be required to furnish additional <br /> surety to the Planning Board. <br /> Concerns were expressed by Board members who recalled past incidents where <br /> this type of surety was accepted and it "disappeared" before the work was <br /> completed. The Board instructed the staff to investigate why this type of <br /> surety was allowed by state statute, and the possibility of revising its <br /> Development Regulations to not allow acceptance of this form of surety. <br /> On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Uhrig, it was voted 4-0: <br /> 1. to approve the language* to be placed in the deeds of the homeowners <br /> which assigns the maintenance of structures and landscaping, and <br /> 2. to release lots #5, 7, 13, 14, and 15. <br /> *The language to be placed in the relevant deeds of the subdivision: <br /> Grantee, by acceptance of this Deed, covenants for himself, his heirs <br /> and assigns that any retaining walls, fences, trees and landscaping in <br /> the right-of-way of the Orchard Crossing Subdivision, upon which the <br /> grantee's property abuts, shall be maintained by grantee and that the <br /> center island of the turnaround on Orchard Lane and the pedestrian <br /> easement on lot 16, including that portion which lies within lot B, <br /> shall be the responsibility of the grantees on lot 16. This covenant <br /> shall apply to only so much of the right-of-way as borders upon the <br /> property conveyed herein. This covenant shall run with the land and the <br /> cost of maintaining said center island, pedestrian easement, retaining <br /> walls, fences, trees and landscaping shall be a charge on such property <br /> regardless of who may own such property at the time the maintenance <br /> expense is incurred. <br /> 183. Dover Lane, Pleasant Street: Ms. Nordby reported that any plants that <br /> did not make it through the winter have been replaced, and they seem to have <br /> taken hold, so she recommends the surety be released. On the motion of Mrs. <br /> Klauminzer, seconded by Mrs. Uhrig, it was voted 4-0: <br /> Based on the inspection and approval of the condition of the landscape <br /> planting at the Graystone Subdivision by the Town Superintendent of <br /> Parks and Trees, the Planning Board votes to release the surety of <br /> $5,000 being held for the assurance that the landscaping planting <br /> survive the 1988/89 winter season. <br /> 184. 246 Concord Avenue, George Issaians , Presentation of Sketch Plan: <br /> Landscape Architect Gary Larson, representing the applicant, made the presen- <br /> tation, consisting of a Site Analysis Plan, showing existing buildings, a <br /> slope analysis, the direction of surface water flows , site vegetation and <br /> soils; an Existing Property Rights Plan, showing metes and bounds, dimensions <br /> and square footage; and a Proof Plan showing the lot can be divided into two 1 <br /> lots, one lot with the existing house, containing approximately 31,000 sq. ft. <br /> and frontage of 150 ft. at the setback line of a conventional roadway and cul- <br /> de-sac along the eastern side of the site, and the other lot containing ap- <br /> proximately 30,500 sq. ft. , with frontage off Concord Avenue. <br /> Mr. Larson commented that this was not the best way to divide the site, and <br /> asked that the Board consider other options: 1) that would substitute a !� <br />