Laserfiche WebLink
11/30/2023 AC Minutes <br />3 <br />SB has not implemented any of these fees. Keeping the current operating budget balanced has re- <br />quired changes to compensate for this missing fee revenue from trash collection. <br />The primary driver of increases in the FY 2025 budget is compensation, but other drivers include <br />the cost of diesel fuel, the prices of contract services that involve vehicles, and overall inflation. <br />Ms. Kosnoff offered to send a full summary of all PIRs to the Committee. <br />Mr. Parker and Ms. Kosnoff described Select Board meeting discussion of a PIR to support enforce- <br />ment of the Town’s leaf-blower restrictions and concerns about escalating interactions with the pub- <br />lic and landscape workers. The Select Board would rather not have uniformed officers handling en- <br />forcement, but rather someone like a health department inspector. At the moment, the police are <br />handling most of the complaints, and there have been many such complaints. <br />Mr. Padaki asked if any one-time revenue could be used to bridge the current gap in the FY2025 <br />budget. Ms. Kosnoff responded that the Town budgets for $3 million in new growth, and there is <br />currently a significant set-aside for the Capital Stabilization Fund (CSF), all of which is ongoing <br />revenue. The Town is not ready to compromise its budget guidelines on the CSF set-aside, but that <br />is an accessible source of additional revenue. There is also unused ARPA money remaining that <br />could be used to partially fund the food waste collection program. <br />Ms. Kosnoff repeated that she is still working with the Town Manager to work out a compromise <br />position on the FY2025 budget, which will most certainly require some tradeoffs. Those tradeoffs <br />will likely impact one or more areas, including PIRs, departmental budgets, and the budget guide- <br />lines for the CSF set-asides. Ms. Kosnoff’s opinion is that the Town should be aiming to manage <br />the operating budget based on an annual growth rate of roughly 3.5%, which allows for Proposition <br />2½ and some modest new growth. For now, the municipal and school departments are working to <br />maintain that approach, and any change in direction would be the result of a serious problem, such <br />as a threat to public health and safety. <br />Mr. Padaki asked about expenses related to immigrants being housed in Lexington. Ms. Kosnoff <br />stated that the Town is hosting about 30 immigrant families at the Aloft and Element hotels. There <br />is no major impact on the Town budget because the state covers the costs of housing, education, and <br />social services. The only impact is a certain amount of staff time to assist in monitoring the situa- <br />tion. <br />Ms. Kosnoff stated that the Town Manager is the main point of contact for services provided to <br />these families, but the Public Health Director is deeply involved in meetings and helping to coordi- <br />nate volunteer support. The National Guard has the primary responsibility for providing services, <br />access to work information, school, transportation, and everything else. <br />Mr. Parker mentioned that due to a lower state match (21.8%), annual CPA revenue had fallen by <br />about $1 million, and asked if that will impact capital requests. Ms. Kosnoff stated that the original <br />budget had assumed a 30% match, but that the shortfall would mostly be absorbed by higher than <br />anticipated interest income. Nevertheless, the total of CPC requests was about $1.7 million more <br />than the available funding. <br />The project to renovate the lower floor of Cary Memorial Library will cost about $5.5 million, with <br />about $1.5 million coming from the Cary Memorial Library Foundation. The CPC offered to fund <br />another $2.3 million with the General Fund providing the remaining $1.7 million via within-levy <br />debt. This would allow the CPC to fully fund its remaining requests, which include community and <br />affordable housing.