Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
maintenance costs. The Glaval brand is slightly more expensive. However, on <br />a test drive, it had better construction, a heavier frame, better aesthetics, and <br />is said to have fewer maintenance problems (and costs). TAC agreed that the <br />slightly more expensive "Glaval" model should be pursued. A motion to <br />support the Glaval bus, and the general recommendations of Jeanette was <br />made, seconded, and approved. Discussion ensued on how to word the RFP <br />evaluation criteria and what to include in the basic requirements. The Town <br />Procurement Director is assisting Ms. Rebecchi with the appropriate <br />wording. <br />7. TDM allocation. Mr. Levison presented a new approach to determining <br />what the TDM recommendation should be. He suggested that TAC should <br />take a certain percentage of the contract cost for our recommendation. The <br />committee decided to wait until we know more about the actual contract cost <br />for the new RFP. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 PM. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Elaine Dratch. <br />Materials presented at the meeting <br />Agenda <br />Minutes of the previous meeting <br />Draft of TAC's contribution to the 2016 Town Report <br />Promotional materials for Starcraft and Glaval buses <br />Table of bus contract costs and TDM recommendations <br />