Laserfiche WebLink
advocated that more time should be given for the Town to finalize the dollar amount requested <br />and determine its desired use. Ms. Fenollosa asked Mr. Malloy if he would be able to release <br />the appraisal to the Committee. Mr. Malloy said that he would but added that a discussion on <br />the appraisal would be better done in an executive session. Ms. Fenollosa asked if Mr. Malloy <br />would be able to meet with the Committee again the following week. Mr. Malloy said he would <br />be available on Thursday, December 7, at 5:00 PM. Mr. Sandeen commented that it would be <br />best to finish this conversation under executive session. Mr. Pressman asked if there was a <br />paper road on the property and if it was included in the appraisal. Mr. Malloy shared that there <br />was a paper road on part of the property and that it is discussed in the appraisal. Mr. Pressman <br />asked if the CPA statute allowed for the consideration of an appraisal organized by the property <br />owner. Ms. Fenollosa stated that she thinks they can consider the alternative appraisal, <br />provided that the appraiser meets the Town’s and industry’s standards. Mr. Sandeen suggested <br />that this question should be discussed in an executive session. <br /> <br />Ms. Fenollosa thanked Mr. Malloy for meeting with the CPC and that they would continue this <br />discussion next week. <br /> <br />Mr. Malloy left the meeting at 5:25 PM <br /> <br />CPA Fund Balance – Ms. Kosnoff presented the CPA Summary FY25 Budget dated 11-30-2023 <br />which included two funding options for the FY25 CPA applications. Ms. Kosnoff explained that <br />the 21.8% state match had a negative impact on the FY24 budget but was partially offset by an <br />increase in projected interest earned. As such, the total revenue for FY24 is about $150,000 less <br />than original projections. Ms. Kosnoff explained that there was still a TBD amount listed under <br />Open Space for the Property Acquisition, but added that per the earlier conversation, there <br />may need to be a TBD noted in another bucket in the spreadsheet. Mr. Beuttell asked what the <br />funding split would have to be between the CPA buckets if the land acquisition’s designated use <br />were to remain flexible. Ms. Kosnoff explained that she had not experienced this occurrence <br />before and would want to verify with Town Counsel on the best practice, but added that she <br />assumes there would need to be some amount of proportionality based on the estimated use. <br /> <br />Ms. Kosnoff discussed funding for the Cary Memorial Library Project. The total cost of the <br />project is $5.5 million. The Library Trust is planning on funding $1.5 million, leaving the need to <br />fund the remaining $4 million. Ms. Kosnoff presented a funding option for the library that <br />would not impact funding for the other applications that would include $200,000 from the <br />Historic Resource bucket, $1,440,000 from Unbudgeted Reserves, and $660,000 from the <br />Undesignated Fund Balance, for a total of $2.3 million in CPA funding. Under this scenario, the <br />Town would be responsible for the remaining $1.7 million for the project. This funding plan also <br />leaves approximately $1.4 million in reserves in case of revenue shortfalls, supplemental <br />funding requests, or other unanticipated funding opportunities. Ms. Kosnoff explained that the <br />Committee tends to keep about $2 million for reserves, but that the Committee had approved <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />