2023-11-16-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4 Ms. Battite requested $1,145,000 for Lincoln Park Field Improvements – Field #2. Ms. Battite commented that this request is nearly identical for the previous request for Lincoln Field #1 and that the turf installation would be covered by the tax levy and not CPA funding. Ms. Battite added that the turf would use a BrockFILL infill instead of a crumb rubber. Ms. Fenollosa shared with the Committee that Town Counsel has approved the eligibility of the Lincoln Field Improvements since CPA funding will not be used for the artificial turf portion of the project. Ms. Battite added that the scope of the project that would be covered by CPA funding, would occur regardless of surface type. Mr. Pressman asked if the Bowman Field project includes funding from the General Fund. Ms. Battite replied that the request for the projected is for full funding from the CPA and Ms. Fenollosa added that there was an error in the CPC’s project list that suggested there might be General Funds allocated for the project. Mr. Pressman raised concern for the drainage problems at the Bowman Field and asked about the confidence that the project will resolve this problem. Mr. Pinsonneault commented that the Bowman Field has never been properly graded or amended and expressed confidence that water can be kept off the field once these practices are implemented. Ms. Battite expressed to the Committee that not all CPA funding for the Recreational Resources bucket is allocated to the Recreation Department. Ms. Battite added that if the Recreation projects are not funded with CPA funding, they would either continue to fail and be taken offline or they would be funded via the tax levy. Ms. Fenollosa asked if Recreation would have enough time to submit a request for tax levy funding for FY25 if the CPC elects not to fund the full amount requested. Ms. Battite replied that it would depend on the project but noted that this has been done in the past. Ms. Battite added that some projects, such as Lincoln Field #2, would have modified usage if delayed in order to maintain safety. Mr. Pressman asked if there was an updated Capital Summary Statement from the Recreation Committee. Ms. Battite said there was and that she could share it with the Committee and that it is also posted online. Mr. Pressman expressed his opinion that given Recreation’s importance as a Town activity, there should be a recurring minimum of $3 million for Recreation capital improvement from the tax levy and noted his belief that the lack of such a budget and subsequent reliance on CPA funding for capital improvements was never the intention of the CPA. Mr. Pressman asked if there were any instances in recent years of the Recreation Enterprise Fund funding capital projects other than at the golf course. Ms. Battite replied that the Enterprise Fund paid $100,000 for the Community Needs Assessment in 2020 and about $175,000 to replace a sump pump at the golf course. Ms. Battite also noted that the Enterprise Fund covers a lot of small capital improvement projects that do not reach the $25,000 threshold for capital improvement requests. Mr. Pressman asked if any of the Recreation