Laserfiche WebLink
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO STMs 2016-2&-4 <br /> the west to Conservation land, and on the north to Pelham Road—which has mostly single-family homes. <br /> It is located close to the center of Town, equal distant to the two most-significantly overcrowded <br /> elementary school districts. This Committee agrees that the pressing space needs of the School <br /> Department drive the Town's consideration of this purchase. However, if it were ultimately to be <br /> determined that Pelham is not appropriate for school use, this report also identifies an opportunity to <br /> create senior/affordable housing. <br /> This is a non-exhaustive, not prioritized, list of potential school and municipal uses: <br /> •Lexington Children's Place(LCP, the mandated Lexington Public Schools (LPS)pre-K program) <br /> At 10 classrooms, the current building would fit the program requirements, but would require <br /> both hazardous-materials remediation and some renovation. That is estimated to cost between $5 and <br /> $10 million to make it ready for use in the short term; between $10 and$15 million to make it "20-year" <br /> caliber for long-term use. These estimates are based on the information from limited access and <br /> hazardous-materials testing that has already been done. Those results provide a preliminary estimate of <br /> $750,000 for remediation, which is included in the above estimates. Until we have more complete access <br /> to the property,we will not know the exact nature of the remediation/renovations necessary. <br /> The current lack of permanent space for LCP is in the existing Capital plan,requiring a near-term <br /> solution. <br /> This could also allow the gym and cafeteria to be used by Recreation Department or <br /> Senior-Services programming from the adjacent LexCC. <br /> This could also allow the facility to operate as an additional Lextended Day Program site, helping <br /> to reduce the current 175-student wait list for that programming. (That Program is not a LPS requirement; <br /> it is a fee-based, operating-revenue-neutral,program.) <br /> This could provide space for other stand-alone programs within the LPS for which we do not <br /> currently have adequate space (e.g., the Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunities (METCO) <br /> Extended Learning Program (MELP) and the Lexington, Arlington, Burlington, Bedford, Belmont <br /> (LABBB) Collaborative for special-needs students). <br /> An additional, low-usage, connecting roadway would be required from the LexCC to provide <br /> additional access,with an estimated cost of$350,000 to $400,000. <br /> The preference of the School Committee has been to locate this program close to an existing <br /> elementary school for economies of facilities and staffing. <br /> •Full-size, Elementary School <br /> If school population continues to grow at the current rate, the Town will need more elementary <br /> space within the next several years. Initial work has been done to determine that a 24-classroom school <br /> could theoretically be sited on the property at a preliminary estimate of$53 million to remove the existing <br /> building (recognizing it contains hazardous materials) and construct a new school. A full-scale, two-way <br /> road connecting to Marrett Road would be required to support this use and is estimated to cost an <br /> additional $3 million. Additional work must be done (e.g., detailed consideration of soil analysis and <br /> wetlands on the site, among many other factors)to move this from theoretical to feasible. <br /> This would provide full relief for current overcrowding and foreseeable enrollment growth. It also <br /> allows more flexibility for special-educational programs, LCP, and possibly middle school or high school <br /> as the grade assignments could be changed if necessary due to swing space needs, or growth. This <br /> Committee has previously reported that further elementary-school capacity increases were foreseeable <br /> even after the increases being provided by the currently approved additions, and a placekeeper has been <br /> included in this Committee's Five-Year Capital Plan. <br /> This could eliminate the need for a new LCP building if redistricting into this new school freed <br /> up sufficient spaces on the Harrington campus. This preserves flexibility at the Harrington campus for <br /> swing space or future growth. <br /> 2 <br />