|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2023-08-09-AHTC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Ad hoc Transportation Committee - AHTC - New 12-2022
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-08-09-AHTC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2023 4:18:19 PM
Creation date
8/30/2023 4:12:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2023
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Susan <br />Through the end of December?It's on a calendar year basis. <br />2 <br />Deepika <br />that dovetails nicely.If nobody sees any problem with us sharing these kinds of reports with this group, <br />then we can definitely take the help,after we have done a decent draft,share it with them and get some <br />feedback.Thank you,Susan.The team was okay with getting their help too.3 <br />Bridger: <br />Howard did ask a question about,what are we going to recommend?We're in a public meeting,this is a <br />quorum,we can actually talk amongst ourselves about what are some of our thoughts,specifically,around <br />the sections,around the specific asks that the Select Board has put in the charge,based on where we are <br />now.Now,what we're writing,now,what we're going to write,not how we're breaking ourselves up to <br />write it.But based on everything you've read,and listen to?Where are you on the big questions?I think <br />that will help inform how we think about where we need to spend some of our time.And maybe where we <br />need to go back and extract some of the salient points from the research. <br />2 <br />Deepika <br />Requested Bridger to model how we can start discussing what we are thinking as a team. <br />3 <br />Bridger <br />Is everybody okay with that?Because I'm gonna show the outline.And where we've positioned the bold <br />italic parts are the things from the charge itself,based on the sort of narrative that we've approached,but I <br />think we should try to get a sense of the group here on the topic. <br />3 <br />Bridger <br />Shares screen and goes over the report outline. <br />The sections that we had in the report are the first one was a summary of the charge.And the challenge is <br />really like the introduction to the report.And likely some of the executive summary right up front.The <br />last ad hoc committee,I was on the we wrote the executive summary after we wrote the whole report.So <br />something to keep in mind is that piece of paper eventually gets created.So that's section one.And we <br />had Deepika playing a role there in sussing that out.Then we had a history section to sort of re baseline <br />the Select Board and other audiences on the history.We have a lot of rate history documentation,but it's <br />voluminous.And we need to pull the salient parts out.And we,Susan and Sally,we put your names <br />against the sections.We have some Northeastern examples and the Interlaken story,and then there's the <br />whole pandemic impact.So there's the history. <br />Then as you can see,one of the charges that we have As to is about like where are we with current <br />operations in ridership.So,we had some good tables and some documents that we could pull from that we <br />used in the public meeting the pictures of the routes as they exist now,and then we as a group had <br />discussed the bracketing our analysis as a pre pandemic 2019 and a post pandemic 2023 and not doing 15 <br />years of route and ridership comparison because there was a lot of tweaking and then talking about <br />capacity of the system versus utilization.And then looking at this,this is the bold question.So identify
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.