Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting <br />April 19, 2016 <br />Follow-up Discussions of any matters in the 2016 Annual Town Meeting (ATM) <br />Mr. Kanter reported that in the light of a previous debate at that Meeting and questions <br />raised by Ms. Barnett, he felt it called for insuring this Committee had adequate back-up <br />information in preparation for the upcoming presentation of Article 8(o), Grain Mill Alley <br />Design Implementation. He had started a dialogue with Ms. Tintocalis, that project’s <br />th <br />proponent, by his April 6 e-mail which cited the top-level budget for the <br />now-reduced-scope project and asked for the next-level-down basis for the amount in each <br />category of that budget and provided some methodologies that he expected had been used <br />to build the budget. He last heard from Ms. Tintocalis, or any of the Town staff who had <br />th <br />been “cc” on his e-mails, was from her on April 14. In total, the new information gained <br />was (1) the contracted landscape architect for the project, GroundView Design, had <br />developed the schematic design and provided that top-level budget; (2) that she didn’t have <br />anything further to explain how that budget was built; (3) her cite of the kinds of physical <br />elements that were contemplated be included in the project area; and (4) she said that area <br />was approximately 27’X45’. <br />th <br />Mr. Kanter said he responded with his April 14 e-mail advising that based on the project <br />not having what he considered a demonstrably credible estimate, especially with <br />construction funds being requested and now appreciating the project is only at the <br />schematic level, he could only support funding the net amount ($3,000) cited in the budget <br />as needed for a “Final Design”. <br />The Committee then discussed this new information about the project’s status and <br />funding-request basis. (The Committee’s previous position had been 4–1 in favor of <br />recommending approval to the ATM of the funding request.) <br />A Motion was made and seconded to change the Committee’s position to recommending <br />disapproval of the funding request—which is now $127,838. Vote: 3–0 <br />Mr. Kanter announced that, in his position as a Town Meeting Member, he would be <br />offering an Amendment to the current Article’s Motion changing the requested amount to <br />the $3,000 net amount cited for getting to a “Final Design”. He said he would be clear that <br />was not a Committee-prompted Amendment nor had the Committee taken a position on it. <br />Next Meeting: <br /> Ms. Hai asked the Committee to mark their calendar for a potential <br />th <br />Committee meeting with the Board of Selectmen next Monday, the 25, in the early <br />evening before the Town Meetings’ sessions. <br />Approval of Minutes: <br />A Motion was made to approve the Minutes for this Committee’s <br />meeting on April 13, 2016, as presented. Vote: 3–0 <br />Adjourn: <br />A Motion was made and seconded at 8:34 .. to adjourn.Vote: 3–0 <br />PM <br />These Minutes were approved by the CEC at its meeting on April 26, 2016. <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />