Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE - STM 2016 -4 (PART 1) <br />NEASC placed MRHS on "Warning" status solely due to the condition of the building. This warning has <br />forced the school to provide regular progress updates to NEASC on addressing these issues. <br />In addition, the existing 40 year -old building is no longer properly sized. With a total gross floor area of <br />305,000 sq. ft., it was built to handle 800 students. Experience has shown that this is much larger than the <br />actual enrollment coming from member towns. <br />Renovation is not a practical option. A capital project to renovate the existing building would trigger a <br />mandate to correct all outstanding code violations, raising the price to over $100 million. With no swing <br />space, the renovations would create up to ten years of continual disruption and displacement. The renova- <br />tion would not receive MSBA support, and would not be eligible for supplemental funding from capital <br />fees for out -of- district students. Therefore, a renovation project would take longer and cost member towns <br />more than the proposed reconstruction. <br />Reconstruction <br />In 2009, the MSBA agreed to partner with MRHS on a school renewal project with a reimbursement rate <br />of at least 40 %. The next step was to initiate the Feasibility Study required by the Massachusetts School <br />Building Authority (MSBA). A school building committee was formed and an owner's project manager, <br />architect and estimator were hired. However, the project planning missed key MSBA deadlines while the <br />District's towns disagreed on details of the school project, including the size of the new school. <br />Understanding the critical nature of this project, the MSBA was patient and granted several deadline ex- <br />tensions, but in 2014 they set a final deadline of June 30, 2016. In 2015 the School Committee agreed to <br />design the school for an enrollment of 628 students. The MSBA process moved forward, creating prelim- <br />inary costs estimates for three options: school renovation, school renovation with an addition, and a new <br />school. The cost estimates showed that the new school option was not only the most cost - effective, but <br />also that it had the shortest construction time, with an expected opening on or before September 2020. <br />The new school will be constructed adjacent to the existing building on land that the school currently <br />owns in Lincoln, MA. It will have a total gross floor area of 257,745 sq. ft. and will support an enrollment <br />of 628 students. The design of the new school will enhance the MRHS educational program by allowing <br />the implementation of a Career Academy Model, which closely connects and integrates career education <br />with rigorous academics. The District will seek LEED Silver certification for the new building. <br />Funding <br />The total project budget now stands at $144,922,480, with a construction budget of $119,200,892. The <br />MSBA has agreed to a reimbursement rate of 44.75 %, but only for costs that it deems eligible. The ineli- <br />gible costs total $46,018,268, the majority of which are due to the project's $446 per sq. ft. construction <br />cost which exceeds the maximum MSBA reimbursement rate $299 per sq. ft. This means $33,829,737 of <br />the project costs are ineligible for reimbursement. The project's cost per square foot ratio is comparable to <br />that of other recently completed renovations at Massachusetts vocational technical schools, which typical- <br />ly have a higher ratio due to the specialized spaces needed for vocational education. Additional ineligible <br />cost include $6,192,009 for a construction contingency; $3,050,538 for site work costs, which exceed the <br />MSBA reimbursement level of 8 %; $1,295,588 for construction bonds, insurance and other costs; <br />$1,150,396 for permitting; and $500,000 for moving and communications costs. The total MSBA reim- <br />bursement is estimated to be $44,100,000, which is 30.4% of the total project budget. <br />The MRHS funding plan anticipates issuing a series of 30 -year bonds to fund the construction. Three <br />bonds would be issued: one in July of 2016, a second in July of 2018 and a final issue in 2020. The bonds <br />would use a level debt - service schedule, with relatively consistent annual payments. This bonding sched- <br />ule creates a higher total interest cost, but it provides some advantages. It significantly reduces the higher <br />debt service payments that happen in the early years for municipal bonds on a level - principal schedule. It <br />also allocates debt service evenly over the life of the bonds. <br />3 <br />