|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2016-03-21-ATM-Article 34 of 2016 - assault-weapon-ban-town counsel opinion-rpt
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
ELECTIONS AND TOWN MEETING ACTION & WARRANTS
>
Town Meeting Minutes and Reports
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
Reports
>
2016-03-21-ATM-Article 34 of 2016 - assault-weapon-ban-town counsel opinion-rpt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 4:19:54 PM
Creation date
3/13/2016 2:51:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2016
Author or Source
Town Counsel
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Town Meeting Report from Anderson & Kreiger that contains its legal opinion regarding Article 34 - Amend General Bylaws - Guns.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANDERSON <br /> f ER <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> CONFIDENTIAL: ATT NEY-C;L ENT COMMUNICATION <br /> To: Board of Selectmen, Town of Lexington <br /> Carl Valente, Town Manager <br /> From: Kevin Batt, Mina Makarious, and Christina Marshall <br /> ANDERSON & KREIGER LLP <br /> Re: Citizen's Article on Assault Weapons Ban <br /> Date: February 4, 2016 <br /> You have asked us to identify potential legal concerns with a ban on the manufacture, sale, and <br /> possession of assault weapons in Lexington. A Lexington Town Meeting Member has submitted <br /> a citizen's petition article substantially similar to an assault weapons ban ("AWB") ordinance <br /> enacted in Highland Park, Illinois. <br /> The Highland Park ordinance was recently upheld by the Seventh Circuit. The Supreme Court <br /> denied the plaintiff's petition for writ of certiorari in December 2015. Friedman v. City of <br /> Highland Park, Illinois, 784 F.3d 406 (2015), cent. denied, 136 S.Ct. 447 (2015). Although the <br /> Supreme Court's denial has no precedential effect, it signals a continued reluctance by the Court <br /> to consider Second Amendment cases following District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 <br /> (2008), which recognized a constitutionally-protected right to keep guns in the home for self- <br /> defense, and McDonald v. City of Chicago, Illinois, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), extending the Second <br /> Amendment to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. <br /> Leaving aside federal constitutional and preemption challenges, the proposed bylaw may well be <br /> preempted by the Massachusetts state AWB, codified at G.L. c. 140, § 131M. <br /> SHORT ANSWER <br /> This article contemplates enactment of a bylaw and is therefore reviewable by the Attorney <br /> General. If enacted and approved by the Attorney General, the bylaw may be subject to <br /> challenges under Article 89 of the Massachusetts Constitution (the "Home Rule Amendment"), <br /> state preemption principles, and the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Given the <br /> existence of a state-level AWB and comprehensive licensing scheme for firearms, the proposed <br /> bylaw is quite vulnerable to such challenges. <br /> 3A0339303.1 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.