Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3 <br /> <br />Dr. Tung made the motion to grant the variance to Craft Food Hall Projects at 1050 Waltham <br />Street, and 10 Maguire Rd to perform reduced Oxygen Packaging for Sous Vide food Cooking <br />Techniques given that the HACCP plan in its entirety is followed on a daily basis. Craft Food <br />Hall project must send to the Lexington Health Department their date, time, and temperature logs <br />on a monthly basis for 6 months. The Board of Health will review to determine the continuation <br />after 6 months. Only ServSafe-certified employees will be able to prepare the food items using <br />the Sous Vide techniques and Craft Food Hall project. <br /> <br />All copies of employees, and serve safe certifications must be submitted to the Health Office. <br />Craft food hall projects must submit paperwork stating that all staff has read and understand the <br />HA CCP plan and that once training is complete a training document to sign and kept on file for <br />each employee stating they understand all aspects of the HACCP Plan Craft Food Hall Project <br />must send a copy of the signature page to the Lexington Health Department. <br />The motion was seconded by Dr. Geller. The Board voted unanimously to grant the variance. <br /> <br /> <br />Request for Hearing – 5 April Lane, Apt 11 <br />Section 410.850 of Minimum Standard of Fitness for Human Habitation (State Sanitary <br />Code, Chapter II) <br /> <br />Attorney Annie Lee gave an opening statement to the Board reminding them that this hearing is <br />to review new findings and also reminded the Board of their authority. Ms. McKenna feels there <br />is a State Sanitary Health code violation occurring and would like help from the Health Office in <br />determining who is responsible for repairing the issue. Ms. McKenna has presented to the Board <br />new evidence showing what Ms. Mckenna believes will prove the Condo association is <br />responsible for the Sanitary drainage issue. Ms. Belanger the Health Office Director, and Ms. <br />McCartin the Health Office Director Assistant both were present at the property during what Ms. <br />McKenna was referring to as a backflow drainage issue episode. Neither Ms. Belanger nor Ms. <br />McCartin witnessed any disturbance in the toilet or change in the water level. Therefore, <br />bringing both Ms. Belanger and Ms. McCartin to the decision that there is no sanitary code <br />violation. <br />The Board of Health feels there is no health code violation and feels strongly that if there is a <br />problem and it needs a plumber, they are not qualified to decide whether there is or isn’t a <br />backflow drainage issue. There are no documents from a licensed plumber identifying the issue <br />which also makes it hard for the Board to determine who’s at fault. <br />Dr. Geller asked does the toilet work and if it doesn’t work because of the backflow whose <br />responsibility is it? <br />Attorney Lee answered Dr. Geller’s question by saying the liability is based on the analysis she <br />gave at the last hearing. Regarding this matter, the liability is ultimately a question between the <br />unit owner and the condo association. It’s not the Board’s responsibility to receive condo docs <br />and interpret them. That is a matter for the court. <br /> <br />Dr. Heiger- Bernays made a motion that the Board of Health affirms the Director of Public <br />Health's conclusion for 5 April Lane Unit 11, that the Sanitary drainage system including the <br />toilets, meets the requirements of 105 CMR 410 as it is properly connected to a public sewage <br />system. Furthermore, any determination of liability regarding any alleged plumbing issues <br />occurring at 5 April Lane unit 11, and the determination of liability between the unit owner and <br />the Condominium Association, is outside the Board of Health's jurisdiction.