Laserfiche WebLink
CORRECTED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2023 ATM <br />The Lexington CPF receives the annual receipts from our local surcharge, the State supplement, and interest <br />on the balance in our Town's CPF. Under the statute, 10% of the total received each year is allocated to <br />each of the following categories: Community Housing, Historic Resources, and Open Space. The remaining <br />70% of this income may be spent for any of these categories or for Recreation. Funds may be accrued from <br />year to year and are available for debt service on previously approved projects. <br />A CPA -funded project can only be brought to Town Meeting for action through recommendation by the <br />CPC whose membership, in our Town, is prescribed in the Code of Lexington as follows: <br />§ 29-23A. There is hereby established a Community Preservation Committee pursuant to Section <br />5 of Chapter 44B of the General Laws (the "Act") consisting of nine members. The Board of <br />Selectmen shall appoint three members of the Community Preservation Committee and the <br />following bodies shall each select one of its members for membership on the Community <br />Preservation Committee: the Conservation Commission, the Planning Board, the Recreation <br />Committee, the Historical Commission, the Housing Authority, and the Housing Partnership. <br />Town Meeting can only approve, reduce the funding, or disapprove a project; it cannot change the purpose. <br />Town Counsel has provided an opinion that Town Meeting can change the funding mechanism for a given <br />project (cash or debt). This Committee gives our recommendation on each of the projects put before Town <br />Meeting. <br />See the report of the CPC for information on how Lexington has spent from the CPF since 2007. <br />The projected available CPF cash is not a limitation on what the CPC can recommend to Town Meeting for <br />spending approval. The CPA can—and often does—include debt financing, which is then paid over the <br />term of the borrowing using the CPF. In fact, CPA has proposed funding the Monroe Center for the Arts <br />renovation (2023 ATM Article 10(b) with a combination of existing CPA funds and $2 million debt. This <br />Committee has always stated that cash funding should be the first preference. However, (1) Any such debt <br />should be for as short a term as practical, with and payment front-end loaded, as practical, after considering <br />the funding projected for the CPF (not including any State supplemental funds) over at least the next 10 <br />years; and (2) Such debt should be approved only after consideration of potential future projects that might <br />come before the CPC for consideration which would require funds beyond those allocated to the three, <br />mandatory reserves for Open Space, Historic Resources, and Community (Affordable) Housing. <br />The debt service is an obligation borne by the CPF throughout the term of those instruments—whether <br />short-term financing (i.e., notes, such as a Bond Anticipation Note [BAN]) and/or long-term financing (i.e., <br />a bond). It is the Town's practice that each year's debt service will be paid from any funds remaining in the <br />reserve category under which that project was eligible—whether or not initially financed from that <br />reserve—before use of other available funds. In subsequent years, the CPC recommends to Town Meeting <br />those obligatory debt -service -payment appropriations. (See Article 10(q).) <br />One approach that provides flexibility in deciding how much, if any, CPF cash should be applied up front <br />for a large project is to defer that decision by initially issuing a BAN for a term of one year or less for the <br />full amount of the project. (A BAN typically carries an interest rate that is below even the relatively low <br />rates paid on the Town's bonds.) When a BAN matures, a decision can be made whether to use CPF cash <br />to reduce the total for which a longer-term bond would then be issued. Doing so gives the Town a better <br />idea of how much CPF cash should be held in anticipation of the next—and later—years' demands upon <br />the CPF. This mechanism has been used in the past, and this Committee expects it to be proposed in the <br />future for other large projects. <br />The CPC carefully husbands available funds and has recommended taking on additional debt for the <br />Monroe Center of the Arts renovation after considerable deliberation. The proposed addition at the Monroe <br />Center will improve accessibility with the installation of an elevator and creating new, gender -neutral <br />bathrooms. Without borrowing, CPF available fund balances would have dropped below the $2 million, <br />which is the minimum the CPC customarily likes to keep on hand in event a large project needs funding in <br />the near future. The impact of debt service from the Monroe Center project will be mitigated by the <br />cessation of financing payments on Marrett Road and Cary Memorial Building Construction ending in <br />FY2024 and FY2025, respectively. <br />